Obama takes action against the decision to Trump on prohibition of entry in the US

Obama breaks the tradition that involves abstaining from criticism by the outgoing president to his successor. Barack Obama, the US president for two terms, has openly criticized the incumbent president, Trump, for the prohibition of entry in the United States for seven countries belonging to the Muslim religion, mentioned as a possible origin of terrorists. Compounding the situation, there were also the Trump statements will facilitate, in the future, the entry in the United States belonging to the Christian religion. This measure has caused great inconvenience in airports to citizens of those countries, even though they were not terrorists and already collaborate with the US administration, as taught in the universities, Army interpreters and other high value-added jobs. The protests that have occurred in American streets have immediately, sanctioned the great opposition to the measure by a large percentage of the US company, which sharpens the mind deep political split in the country, caused by an unfair electoral system, which allowed Trump to hold the highest office in the state, despite having received nearly three million votes less of attacking the White House, Hillary Clinton. The taking of Obama's position is not, however, a surprise, given that the former president had publicly stated they want to intervene in the political debate if there had been an injury to the fundamental rights, have always been present in American democracy. In fact the statement of Obama has a double meaning, because in addition to highlighting the violation of the principles and fundamental rights of Americans, it also has a meaning far more politically relevant, since it is detached, not only ideally, at the side of the protesters, but it It urges them to continue the protest and also to grow in number, making it a great leader of the objection to the measure of Trump. It is impossible to miss in this intention almost a project to fill the void of the Democratic Party, still struggling with the defeat of Clinton, from which there seems to have recovered. The spontaneity of the protests, which are ideal continuation of demonstrations against Trump, already started during the campaign, it does not seem to have yet, in fact, a structural political project, capable of countering the action of the new President, beyond the protests. There is, indeed, a sort of network of mayors of US cities, very important, who have already announced their intention to disobey the orders of the White House on refugees, but that feeling seems to have been born without the necessary coordination that will be needed to oppose the central government action. Obama certainly can not take the reins of the protest, but can represent a sort of guardian, to address the events towards the protection of rights. It is a very delicate subject and heard, both in American public opinion, which on one side of the Republican Party, and that is causing several protests in diplomatic circles, bringing the presidency Trump towards a sort of international isolation. In addition to Obama's intervention value, the most important political factor is the presence of a clash going on between Trump and consistent part of American society, which looks set to worsen more and become more deeply rooted in the country, with the consequence, predictably, to create strong social tensions and to alter the internal balance of the country. The United States, seem to meet, to socially dangerous situations never felt at home, well beyond the tensions coming, for example, from the black community. At this stage, more than ideas, albeit extreme, of President Trump, it seems more dangerous his total political inexperience, his impetuosity and character of a character totally unsuited to playing a role of such importance. Trump moves without any caution and without any filter, completely surrounded by an assertive apparatus and unable to contradict: a political product of the worst degeneration of deep America, without any visual that is not the very short period, accompanied by gestures and measures easy to hold and use and consumption of an electorate that can not represent the American sentiment. Certainly Clinton started from very negative circumstances, but would not bring the US to this situation already dangerous after just a few days in office.