Israel, with U.S. and UK consider the possibility of an attack on Iran

The possibility of a war against Iran is mounting considerably. Israel would gain the support of U.S. and UK for a possible military action, which may be realized in a possible missile attack against Iranian missile installations. The next date in November of eight is considered a milestone in the definition of the crisis: in fact on that date the IAEA will announce its report on the progress of Iran's nuclear program and any content considered negative might raise the likelihood of a conflict. Israel officially considers the presence of nuclear weapons in the military arsenal of Tehran, is a direct danger to Tel Aviv and in general for the western world. On this basis, Netanyahu is committed to the belief of Israeli institutions to have a free hand in case the decision to employ military force prevails, however, public opinion is divided on the issue and recent surveys, only 41% of the population fully supports the Decision war. This underlines the awareness of the Israeli attack on the objective difficulties of the Islamic Republic, because of the knowledge of the military force available to Iran, fully able to provide appropriate responses on the military in case of attack. It should, however, dwell on the reasons for this escalation, if the concerns about Iran's nuclear weapons are real or if there are other reasons to justify such a going concern, even from the USA. For the last time the Israeli government were marked by setbacks and at international level than on the inner. The issue of Palestinian recognition of the UN, with the undoubted diplomatic success of Abu Mazen came to the growing success of the phenomenon of "indignados" Israelis have obfuscated in a decisive manner the approval of the Prime Minister in Tel Aviv, which increasingly sees its image blurred. The method of raising the voltage to the level of alert is a constant of political Netanyahu, who depends on the liking of the extreme parts of the country trying to gain credit as a strong man of the reasons Israel. Focusing on Iran means, at this time, shift the attention from the Palestinians, such as the construction of settlements, which many have resulted in convictions on the world stage. Push on the vulnerabilities of the West Iranian armament means broadening the issue to a wider pool of interest, enabling it to regain sympathies to the Israeli cause. In the same way the U.S. and the UK looking for the traditional foreign policy objective way to hide the difficulties internally. The feeling, however, is that this time is exaggerating the issue, subject to the hazard dell'ordigno nuclear power in the hands of the Islamic state, these threats could give Iran an excuse not to launch military action in fine style, but to choose for minor maneuvers, but still potentially dangerous for peace in the region. Iran is a dangerous opponent, and certainly a danger to peace, but that is no excuse to speak openly of military attack, getting the result to exasperate the minds of the Arab population, especially of what Tehran vedein an aggregator of its instances. To combat the Iranian regime is more convenient to insist on sanctions and diplomatic isolation, trying to destabilize the dictatorship from within. Iran to use for any purpose that ultimately are more propaganda than anything else is irresponsible and incompetent to be especially: one more proof of the non-suitability of the assignment that Netanyahu is playing.