The growing aversion to Germany is not just the fault of Berlin

Behind the solutions developed for the rescue by the various crises that have hit the southern countries of Europe, the Mediterranean, there is a constant harsh conditions imposed by Germany, who are not responsible for the consequences, whether they are individuals or entities subject , both public and private, but are distributed within the community, going to exacerbate already difficult situations and increasing the unjust inequalities already present. This has created a bike generalized aversion to the German village, which poses a threat to the process of European integration. In fact, this effect is already well aware, the provision of a two-speed European Union is already abundantly, if not the end, at least a sudden interruption of the process. However, the growing aversion to Germany deserves a careful analysis, in relation to what is happening. There is at the base of the attitude German a precise strategy that aims to take advantage of the economic crisis, hiding behind the financial rigor as a screen to enhance productivity and marketing of German products to the detriment of direct competitors in the territory of the Union. While one can understand the need to hold the phenomenon of inflation and the lack of cooperation to combat the sovereign debt of other states, on the other hand it is clear that the rigidity is functional to the internal needs of the productive fabric of the country. This analysis, however, can only partially explain the growing opposition to Germany, which is worth only a fraction of this aversion. In fact, Berlin, despite being the strong partner of the EU, is merely putting the stakes of which are carried out within the action of the government of any State. Unfortunately, and is a common, almost all the executives involved in the crises have chosen to repay the total cost of the entire citizenship, hitting within this, to a greater extent, what was called the middle class, just because the majority numerically in total. The loss of most of the population has created a block of consumer services that have depressed growth, creating a tightening of the economic system itself. This happened in Spain, in Italy, Portugal, Greece and now in Cyprus. The sequence of events that starts with the declaration of the crisis, the enforcement of measures and concludes with the general impoverishment is the same in all countries. Germany does not seem to blame if they are not affected banks, often at the root of the financial crisis or if politicians are not prosecuted, even criminally for poor governance. However, it remains the need to loosen the hold that Germany impose, where no government has proceeded in different ways, the most important member of the Union must take responsibility to influence the executive action of the individual states through agreements that loose fiscal tightening in favor restart the economy. Berlin will still be forced to make this choice when its target market, the euro area, it can no longer absorb its production, anticipating that moment and thus reduce the hostility towards him. It must be said, however, that in the German village is experiencing a somewhat unusual situation for some time now in European countries, where the prime minister has more support on the internal rather than international. Merkel, in fact, on the eve of the elections enjoys high approval ratings, which make it a favorite for re-election, because of the attitude held stubbornly in Europe. This has led some analysts and observers Germans to arrive to advocate exit of Germany from the euro, but in reality it's not economical to own them that they would find a coin super assessed, resulting in the collapse of exports and stunted growth . This remains the only thing that can hope for a softening of positions in favor of rigor, even if it can not be possible that after the elections until then Chancellor will continue on the road that has earned him much consensus in the country .