Germany is still standing to lead Europe?

The issue of the scandal of German cars highlights the issues of opportunities that the German government can not avoid being involved. Meanwhile, the fraud is established, it is not speculation or mere suspicion, the German automaker has rigged the data, which related to emissions, especially in a country, the United States, very sensitive to the issue of environmental pollution, to be able to increase its sales volume. In the German state bodies responsible for monitoring there has been an obvious lack, but this relief is not even the worst, since Berlin is a shareholder of the automotive group indicted. This factor is, by itself, a tremendous blow to the credibility of the country you want to ask, and indeed already exercises this supremacy, at the helm of the European Union. The problem, therefore, does not concern only the German national borders, but invests the past and the future of political and economic development of the European structure. If we think of the many references to the rigor aimed at different members of Brussels and the rigidity shown in the negotiations with Greece, one must ask what right Germany literally imposed his own point of view, thanks to its economic strength, as part of this power was built on lies. It is clear that not all of the production system in Germany is based on misinformation, as, equally, there is no need to say that the whole German industry has used methods not lawful to doubt the legitimacy of the actual Berlin to exercise the kind of domination that has hitherto exercised; but it is likewise legitimate doubts on the entire German industrial system, if one of the major industries in the country, which has the state as shareholder, has managed to deceive consumers and therefore the same corporate balance sheets. The fact that the industry had been indicted on the goals too high, is, then, an aggravating circumstance of this case, because it helps to form a gross domestic product through which the German government has power already politically unbalanced against states Foreign, that should be equal, because members of a supranational institution. The case showed that Germany itself has assumed a position to uncertain consumers and allies, failing immediately to the required capacity of decision so exercised against other countries. Europe itself seemed disoriented in the face of unexpected absence of Germany and, indeed, it has remained a hostage in the precariousness of the situation. The story, then, offers several insights that do not seem to be caught, deliberately, by members of the European Union. Yet never has been better opportunity to redefine, in sense totally opposed to that so far implemented the relations between states, balancing the excessive power exercised German unlawfully and, at the same time, provide for sanctions for those states, who as associate companies engaged in misconduct, they do not exercise due control or worse they may be accomplices. The integrity of the institution and the state's ability to carry out controls, requirements appear too important to not be insured to the citizens of the state itself and the countries with which it has entered into a covenant as special as that on which He wants to establish the European Union. Now we have to see what will be the behavior of Berlin in the near future political, when you can not show that the speeches and the intentions of the government were not supported by sufficiently virtuous behavior, at least in the aspect of supervision and then the Germany's wishes can not be supported by the moral force of which up to now has become a shield.