Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
lunedì 5 ottobre 2015
Israel wants to provoke a third intifada?
The
items that classify as third intifada demonstrations, sometimes
violent, that are taking place in the Palestinian territories occupied
by Israel, show that the situation is again falling to dangerous
developments. Once
again the prime minister in Tel Aviv said he was willing to peace talks
with the Palestinians, but these intentions do not seem to believe no
one, not even the old allies of Israel: the United States. The
statement by the head of the Israeli government is framed in the usual
tactic of good intentions never supported by the facts, which, for many
Palestinian circles, are interpreted as a real provocation. Moreover,
to strengthen the climate of police have been several initiatives
designed to stifle any revolt, even and especially the peaceful type, to
nip any possible support for the Palestinian cause on the part of
international public opinion and provoke the reaction of the groups or
individuals more exaggerated
to justify harsh repression, that hit, so increasing the freedom of
movement of persons and their property, such as houses that were
destroyed for reprisals absurd, so as to promote, then the further
expansion of settlements. The
climate created by the Israeli government, formed by members of the
nationalist right, which does not want to recognize the right of
Palestinians to form their own state and that aims to increase their
territories for the sovereignty of Tel Aviv, looks set to spawn a
provocation, that would allow a repression justified; if this is true, it understands the real intentions of Israel are the ones to go in the opposite direction to peace. The
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas has always been opposed to violence
and struggles to keep a low profile: a violent reaction of the
Palestinians would be a waste of his authority that could diminish the
prestige granted to him by the international public. This
could be part of a larger plan for Israel, to reduce international
pressure that forced him to undergo the diplomatic world, with a growing
isolation. The central question is why Israel has accelerated at this time in the provocation to the Palestinians? The
move does not seem acceptable to Washington, which, with the Obama
administration has repeatedly committed to reaching a diplomatic
solution to the problem between Israelis and Palestinians. Strong
momentum to accelerate the repressive policy of Tel Aviv seems to be
rather direct engagement taken in the Syrian conflict by the Russians,
which could favor the permanence in power of Assad and retreat military,
with consequent reduction of the political group Islamic State . It
is no secret that Israel has never judged positively the Arab spring,
which could threaten the security of the Israeli state, attitude
confirmed by close ties with the Egyptian military dictatorship, which
has crushed the Muslim Brotherhood, who mingled so too important policy with an almost religious extremist. If
Assad officially there were no reports of hostility, actually
unofficially the two countries had found a peaceful coexistence and
respectful of their political systems. Even
with Russia, despite the increasingly close comparison between Moscow
and Washington, Israel has always had friendly relations and cooperation
and the presence of the armed forces of the Kremlin across borders is
certainly a positive view and identified as element stabilization of the crisis. For
Israel, it is important that the country does not fall into the hands
Syrian Sunni, also moderate, which could give support, as well as
political, even material, to the Palestinian cause. So
with the West pledged to frame the development of counter-caliphate,
Tel Aviv develops its plan to justify its territorial expansion in
defiance to every political expediency, trying to increase the amount of
land taken away to be presented as if the status quo ' objective of the expansion will be achieved.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento