The U.S. wants to conclude within nine months of the peace process between Palestine and Isreal

The agreement to find a compromise that would establish peace between Israelis and Palestinians within nine months, is a prerequisite for dealing in quick times what he could not in several years. The statement, signed by the two parties, could arouse great enthusiasm had he not aware of the enormous difficulties, not only prepared but also the timing of the objective obstacles that are on the path of peace project. The first to become aware of these difficulties are those who push more to the final conclusion of the negotiations: the United States. Obama, since his first term, has among its foreign policy objectives pacification and then the conclusion of the matter between Israel and Palestine. The repeated failures of the peace process, which was frequently interrupted, however, are due also to the attitude of the American president too soft in relation to the executive of Tel Aviv, with the settlement policy that has compromised the dialogue with the Palestinian leadership . What they have achieved is explained by the amount of time spent almost three years of interruption of the negotiations, which were only the culmination of a historical conflict that has lasted too. The U.S. Secretary of State, John Kerry, met with their representatives of the two parties, Tzipi Livni for Israel and Saeb Kerat for the Palestinians, in a climate defined positive and constructive, postponing the next meeting within two weeks in Israel or Palestine. The basic requirement on which to base the negotiations, it is for the Americans, the creation of two independent states, solution broadly supported also by the Palestinians, and the Israelis must make some distinction. If the sectors of Israeli society most progressives are fully in favor of this solution, doubts stronger, despite the statements of Livni, concern the government in Tel Aviv, which does not appear cohesive on the creation of a Palestinian state. It should be noted that the fixed points for the Palestinians for the creation of their own state are the union region, so as to create territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza and the return of territories unduly taken by Israeli settlement construction. Within the Israeli government is, however, a party that was founded just for the defense of the settlements and also some members of the executive would feel even exceeded the two-state solution within the same territory. The presence of these positions, widely known by the U.S., would, of course, more difficult and less linear negotiation, especially at the times indicated and preferred by Washington, which need, for reasons of international policy developments related to the Middle East, to close more quickly as possible and then find an agreement that will ensure stability in the region. A further factor which could impair the behavior of the most extreme of the two parties, which can make provocative actions to undermine the fragile balance in the bud which is based on the opening of negotiations. The danger is real because there are policy areas, both in Israel and Palestine, opposed to any agreement with the opposing party, in the name of a battle to carry on to annihilate the opponent. This is not the majority will of the one, I the other hand, however, there are highly motivated movements on both sides, they do not like the coexistence of the two peoples. The first step to start in a safe and positive negotiations is to isolate these parts minority, but they hold a great capacity for action and mobilization, can negatively affect the peace process has just begun.