Israel does not trust the Iranian new course

The diplomatic breakthrough impressed by the Iranian President Rohani relations with the U.S., does not impress favorably Israel, who does not see a real change in the new political approach to Tehran, but only a further strategy to gain time for the construction of atomic power . In summary this is the vision that Netanyahu 's new course of Iran, raising fears in Tel Aviv negative developments in the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issue. The religious origins of the new president and the power still firmly in the hands of a spiritual guide Khamenei , are more than enough clues to Israel about the true intentions of the theocracy growth . Netanyahu has always been openly hostile to Iran several times and supporter of the need for a preemptive strike , that will solve once and for all what in Israel is considered the most dangerous outside threat , fear proves to a softening of the United States in relations with Iran, to soften the sanctions and thus promote economic recovery in Iran, which might result in the achievement of the objective of the bomb atomic . The assurances of Obama, who , in spite of the satisfaction with the possibility of resuming diplomatic relations with Tehran, has confirmed the extreme caution of the White House , for which there are sufficient verbal reassurance of Rohani , which will have to follow specific actions, which may materially reassure the West about the true intentions of Iran use nuclear power only for civilian purposes. The U.S. intends to recognize this choice to the country of Iran , which falls entirely within its sovereignty , in contrast to Israel this , which is seen as a concession , is an act of weakness. Tel Aviv does not exclude, in the light of these developments , the implementation of a preventive attack even without the USA , where the Israeli secret services arrived at the conclusion that Iran was close to the atomic bomb. This perspective , in fact, it is certainly far more than a few months before , especially when the government was Ahmadinejad , the rapprochement between the U.S. and Iran also allows us to avert the individual initiatives of Israel , that without the help of Washington is not physically able to lead a military action of this magnitude with its , albeit important , armaments. Netanyahu is aware of this , but it should try to maintain a profile with some conciliatory diplomatic prospects that are taking place . For Israel, the isolation internationally that Iran is about to reach a new international means to Tehran , which is recognized by the U.S. subjectivity of international importance especially in the Middle East . For the White House it is a forced move to unlock a diplomatic situation does not suit him more , as befits Tehran continue to be a village perched , convoluted and folded back on itself . This coincidence of interests puts Israel in a position of having to accept, albeit reluctantly, a new scenario which to cope. If Tel Aviv for the isolation of Tehran was the ideal condition , now the Israeli government must review its diplomatic tactics to address the issue ; from the reaction of Netanyahu seems that the government of which he is head , did not seem quite ready to face an event that is materializing with great speed. For now, the angry reaction reveals a great lack of preparation to handle the situation , it would be better interpreted by providing signals , also very cautious , optimism , made of overdrafts , even with all due caution . If the relations between Iran and the U.S. will , as we hope , positive developments, able to bring a lasting peace between the two countries, Israel will have to revise their behavior, but the question is whether Netanyahu will be able to modify it.