Negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issues still to be defined

Tension rises to achieve the goal of an agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue before the date of 31 March. The policy goal is considered critical to international equilibrium and the group of 5 + 1 (the United States, China, Russia, France, UK and Germany), is increasing the pressure on Iran; meetings are continuing and are evaluated positively, but there are still parties in conflict to overcome. According to US diplomats, following negotiations, would still several problems with a high difficulty level to solve. A similar vision, but the other side of the negotiating table, is also that of the Iranians, who still encounter too much distance between the parties, although they consider positive talks to date brought forward. The climate seems relaxing and non-confrontational, a factor considered very important by several analysts, to complete the negotiations. The interest to close the game on schedule is so important for Iran, which would see falling international sanctions, prerequisite to restart its economy, and for the other players directly and not directly involved in the negotiations, which could close a long-running negotiations and reopen international relations of greater cooperation with Tehran. Even the United States has done the rapprochement with Iran a foreign policy priority desired by Obama. On this ground we have already been unofficial approach and partnerships, such as the fight to the caliphate, which could develop into a more organic, to enable the region of the Middle East more stability and security. The determination of the US, to achieve the end result, is evidence that the administration of the White House intends to close the issue in time, not to leave a legacy to the next president who will take office in Washington. Is significant as the American presidential administration, continues on its way, despite the opposition of the Republican Party, which holds a majority in both houses of parliament and the opposition of the Israeli government, which refuses to recognize the right to Tehran develop its nuclear technology for civilian purposes. In this regard, one of the most important points, to overcome differences on which to reach the agreement, to the amount of uranium that will allow Iran to enrich. For the construction of an atomic bomb uranium must be enriched to 90%, but this percentage is reached with very similar processes, from the technical point of view, to those that allow for enriching uranium to 20%, the one used for purposes energy. It is clear then, as the question of the number and type of centrifuges, which will hold in Tehran become central to get the signature of the negotiation. For its part, Iran has always maintained that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only areas of use, such as the production of electricity and medical research.