The danger arising from the claim of the State Islamic attack in Texas

The attack took place in Texas, against an exhibition of drawings of Muhammad, it was claimed by the Islamic State. That this claim is true, there are some doubts: the caliphate, in reality it was not the instigator of the attack, but it would be appropriate to act to take advantage of the media impact. In fact there are, for now, tangible links between the Islamic state and the bombers, who seem to be quite individual, not classified in any movement. However, the claim of Islamic fundamentalists has to seriously ponder: if at this time does not seem to be possible the presence of cells of the caliphate on US soil, it is true, however, that there is plenty of human material capable of attacks in the name of 'religious extremism. We are thus witnessing a phenomenon of recruitment in retrospect, after the attack was carried out and, probably, without even informing the entrance in the formations of the caliphate of the perpetrators of the act. In essence, the Islamic state has the real possibility of finding new effective on American soil, without practically put them to the test in advance. We are facing possible episodes of emulation, which could lead the country in full US terrorism. The threats of the Islamic State, to carry out reprisal bombings, the US Air Force is taking on what is the territory that the caliphate be considered as a sovereign entity, is linked to the anti-American sentiments, which for fundamentalists might happen of every Muslim, even if US citizenship. This assumption is based on the strategy that the Islamic state intends to exercise to begin to threaten the US in their territory. The preceding the massacre of Boston is a potentially very dangerous antecedent, which fortunately has not yet been exploited, but that opens up enormous opportunities in the intensification of the struggle coincidence that Washington is conducting against the Islamic state. The fact that at the time, a major objective of US foreign policy, in the context of world security, is to defeat the caliphate, exposes even more the US to attacks that could become less predictable. The danger could come from both dormant cells, either by elements acting on their own initiative; in both cases the control becomes not impossible, but very difficult. If the Islamic state intends to announce an offensive deep into the heart of the United States, may find followers by propaganda alone remote, centered on the importance of imposing Islamic law in the Western world, a subject of sure success for those inclined to the ' Islamic extremism. For the US it is time to take action in the most possible way to prevent other acts of terrorism: control and repression alone are not enough, need constant work to convince the moderate Islamic order does not spread extremism. The claim of the attack by the caliphate, the Islamic state although it was probably the instigator nor the perpetrator, marks a turning point that the White House should not underestimate the capacity of media that the caliphate has shown more times, is likely to become the main vehicle for recruitment, without serving the Islamic state over its territory, but abroad, with shares potentially far more destabilizing. An individual can become a member of the caliphate, without even asking, but only by sharing the objectives of the Islamic State and practicing terrorism against the enemy indicated by extremists or only perceived as such. The subsequent appropriation of the attack becomes the time that states that the enemy was hit, a factor that explains the strength of the movement. SI is a logical almost elementary, but very dangerous, because it potentially capable of having great chances to escape controls that are commonly practiced to prevent terrorism. In conclusion the phenomenon, while not new, promises to be very worrying for the size that could take and the answer to which, to be effective, must include a range of solutions ranging from international diplomacy to the investigation of the district.