The causes of emigration Eritrea

One of the nationalities that most helped to swell the migratory phenomenon is that the Eritreans. The internal situation of the country is conditioned by an executive who is the systematic violation of human rights its own way of governing. This practice has been defined by a UN report in a similar manner to crimes against humanity. The system of coercion of the Eritrean population is based on the lack of balanced judgment, that is run through a legal apparatus accomplice of the government, which basically authorizes extrajudicial practices, various types of torture, including sexual and obligation of forced labor. The presence of the United Nations Commission was not allowed in the country of Eritrea, and that in fact is an evidence of the conduct of the government of the African nation, and has had to rely on more than 550 testimonies in front of the UN members, registered in foreign countries, to which must be added 160 written reports. Control over Eritreans happens with a huge police apparatus, called worthy of totalitarian regimes, which is present in all areas of society in the country, with a network of informers, which subjects the Eritreans to a constant state of fear and control which can determine the arbitrary detention, disappearance of persons until the physical elimination. The control over the Eritrean nationals is not just the country, but also extends to communities living outside the country. The prison system is structured to deny any information to the families of detainees and the conditions of the prisons are very poor as regards the hygiene and medical care, also because of excessive overcrowding to which must be added the ' systematic use of torture; these conditions determine a large number of suicide. The obligation of military service is, in fact, a form of legalized slavery forcing recruits to forced labor and where the abuse takes place with even sexual abuse. Of course in the country freedom of the press and religious they are totally absent. These conditions determine the great migration that forces to escape much of the Eritrean population, which deserves to be considered, like that in Syria, as coming from a country at war. The West does not have priority as some form of intervention in Eritrea, to overthrow the regime that occupies; but a state of emergency in the country would justify greater attention and demonstration of responsibility, if only to limit the continuing violence in which the population is subjected. The UN itself should put on the agenda a mobilization capable of creating the conditions for an intervention; in the meantime it is unacceptable that the Eritrean refugees have difficulties to be accepted in Europe.