Hungarian intransigence, the EU should respond with the necessary firmness

Budapest continues its repressive policies against refugees, ushering in tougher measures against migrants, which include the arrest. There are already 316 people deprived of their liberty because of the violation of the law on illegal immigration, while the Hungarian authorities continue to reject the limited requests for asylum in Hungary, since the greater part of migrants considers the country only a step closer the destinations chosen Germany and Scandinavian countries. According to police hungarian are over 200,000 people who have crossed the border, along the Balkan route to the German village. The attitude of Budapest, which has hardened further against refugees and against the will of Brussels on the theme of acceptance, puts Hungary in a problematic position, given that, as pointed out by many, if you were to enter Budapest now in the European Union would not have the necessary requirements. This fact, indisputable, highlights the need to revise the treaties of accession to the European Union and to provide, in cases of serious violations, as is precisely the Hungarian, increasingly heavy penalties, up to expulsion and all ' interruption of diplomatic relations. This is necessary to preserve the very foundations upon which the European institution. Regard to the issue of migrants, the intransigence of Budapest we see very different attitudes like those of Belgrade and Zagreb. The Serbs are making a diplomatic operation to convince the Hungarians to allow the refugees to go to the chosen destinations, while Croatia has confirmed its readiness to transit countries to enable them to reach Germany. It is behavior conform to the will of the refugees, which show how they are possible alternatives to those practiced by the Hungarians on the practical level, while the fury of Budapest seems to have had an essentially political to the limit of pure racism. The perception is that Hungary wants to aspire to become a model and an example for closing all the movements of the extreme right that the true idea of ​​a united Europe. Moreover Orban has repeatedly expressed willingness openly illiberal, in contrast with the democratic essence, not only European, but by every mature democracy, going to hit internal dissent with measures that have profoundly limited freedom of expression and the press. His proposal to re-enact the death penalty in Europe has produced a reaction that compels the Hungarian leader to retrace his steps; however repressive ideas are deeply rooted and even showed a certain harmony with much of the social fabric of the country. The question is not irrelevant, but now has taken on such dimensions, with just the story of the refugees, who must determine specific questions on whether the stay of the Magyar country within the European Union. These feelings do not seem on the agenda of the agenda of the continental leaders, it is not known if for one reason or priority for fear of unleashing deep disagreements among the members of Brussels. On the contrary allow such stances, clearly contrary to the principles of the union, is a disaster comparable to that of migrants, although the type and of a different nature, even if the two phenomena, as you can see, are intimately connected. If Europe wants to reach political union and not just economic, it must be uncompromising on the feelings of the individual states and their address, placing absolute limits beyond which must take adequate defenses.