Hungary problem within the European Union

In the EU exists, in an ever more relevant, a problem Hungary. The attitude of Prime Minister Orban, on the establishment of the European openly skeptical, do not worry about this aspect, common to other European political leaders, as to what has been implementing since the leadership of his country. We are facing a mixture of nationalist resurgence, accompanied by strong xenophobia, which produced illiberal laws, like the one that tends to stifle press freedom and therefore critical, with the attempt to restore the death penalty. The present Hungary is a country to watch very carefully, because it may, unfortunately, be a sad glimpse into the future, if the extreme right came to power in France or Italy. Of course, given the size and importance of Hungarian overall European Union, the importance of what had been done in Budapest is not as important as if it happened in Rome or Paris, but the examples provided by the Hungarian scales seem to be going too far the democratic rules laid down by Brussels and the European Union would do well to think of appropriate penalties, to put into practice, not only for Budapest, but to brake so early all those governments who attempt to derail the basic rules around which Europe It was formed. The issue of immigration, which is a very serious organizational problem for Hungary, has become the means to propagate feelings strongly nationalist and anti-democratic. It must be recalled that the Hungarian Prime Minister has promoted persecution against the ethnic minority of gypsies and this line has set the reception to Syrian refugees, guilty of wanting to invade Europe in the Muslim way, rather than assessing people who are fleeing from conflict . We understand that these devices want to create a kind of protected area to extremist ideas, not just metaphorically but also material, as evidenced by the construction of the wall on the border with Serbia. The same Serbian citizens are discriminated against when they tried to enter Hungary, because they could steal the jobs of Hungarian citizens. This setting appears very similar to what is practiced by Putin in Russia, which focused on the exaltation of the country and nationalist identity with religion. This similarity is evident even more so when you consider the context, the European one, which adopts the policy of Budapest. In no other country, there is so distant from the cultural context that Budapest sends forward, when compared with that of Europe, which also has undergone substantial deviations in terms of solidarity between nations, as happened to the Greek crisis. At this time Hungary has more speed, although legitimately elected, that is not true democracy, as the majority exercises control too intrusive of the company in the country, similar to what happens in Russia. The question is whether Europe can not tolerate this situation, remaining indifferent to this anomaly and leaving so that the danger of contagion can move forward on other states. Which, incidentally, seems at least partially to happen, with the other countries in Eastern Europe have been shown to share with Budapest, on what attitude to take towards migrants. The situation requires, therefore, a serious reflection, especially retroactively, on ways of including state entities within the European Union, took place in the years back on the requirements of economic and political expediency, rather than of cultural sharing effective. You could now go back? The application must be relevant if you want to secure the future of the European Union, especially of a political and not just economic. It is clear, in fact, that without unconditional adherence to the principles basic constituents of a united Europe, which are also those on which every mature democracy, by the member states, the road to political union is severely compromised. Thus it appears necessary to review the treaty governing the entry and stay in the European Union, providing for sanction mechanisms that can lead to their exclusion, against those states that want to violate the civil and democratic rights. This should be implemented without any fear of reinforcing possible hostile camps, such as Russia, because that would be an evil infinitely less likely that the European dissolution due to the strengthening of anti-democratic principles within the European Union.