The European Union asks for help to Turkey for the management of refugees

One solution that the European Union has decided to stop the influx of refugees from Syria is to finance Turkey, so to be in charge of refugees and, at the same time, prevents the exit from its borders, preventing access to Europe. If, on the one hand, economic aid is due to the turkish country, which should not only come from Brussels, which has taken charge of a large number of displaced people, it seems less consistent with the Community principles apply to a country such as Turkey, to patrol the borders for the European Union after a financial reward. The affair between Brussels and Ankara's note: Turkey aspired to join the European Union and was rejected because its political standards did not meet the democratic standards necessary. After rejecting the turkish country, ruled by Erdogan she has worsened the processing of civil and political rights, making it appear so the decision of Brussels amply justified, while the international perspective of Turkey has turned to the east with the program to create an area of influence can be similar to that of the Ottoman Empire. These ambitions, at first they were supported by a good development of the Turkish economy, combined with a perception of the neighboring countries that Ankara was able to have a diplomatic influence and cultural consistency. The turning illiberal impressed by the Ankara government and the international myopia caused, however, a state of growing isolation of the country, which has determined the least importance on the international stage. The European promise, then, is, even if informally, the possibility of a revival of Turkey, with a role that can be classified as a humanitarian nature and may allow the reopening of a dialogue with the European Union in distress and in need of ' help Ankara. However, for Brussels the remedy seems worse than the disease. Undoubtedly the considerations made in Brussels, to process this type of offer, were drawn on the short term without a view of wide-ranging; This highlights the inability to manage Community a phenomenon that could easily predict and which, above all, it aims to put an end to disagreements with members opposed the reception, without, therefore, implement any sanction mechanism. The decision to enlist the help turkish could be a good choice if you remained a complementary and not blocked, as presumably will occur, the discussion on respect for the Union. So instead, is also offered a pretext for Turkey to reclaim its acceptance in the Union, making it be, at least in terms of assistance to refugees, better than those countries, especially eastern European, who flaunted a contrary attitude, after all if you think about how they are considered civil rights currently in Hungary, this country would not have the requirements to join the European Union in the same way as them Turkey. From the point of view of the international image this can be passed as an international collaboration for refugees, in reality this is yet another failure of an institution that does not prove to be able to have a sufficient cohesion within it and is unable to solve alone the problems that come from the outside. It seems clear that this is a stopgap solution and the help of a country rejected shows the policy failure in Brussels, which never achieve any objectives of the budget will ever compensate. The delegation to Turkey of limiting traffic migration is likely then to become yet another defeat in Brussels, unless you take advantage of this solution to prepare emergency plans, which must also include taking firsthand problems very unpleasant as possible direct commitments on military grounds, as well as a stronger diplomatic engagement, of which Brussels boasts of knowing exercise without any real reason. This page Europe, from a political perspective, is one of the lowest points reached by the European Union and should certainly be understood as a basis from which to start to not to repeat mistakes so obvious.