The move Turkey had sent a contingent of an unknown number, also referred to 3,000 units, in Iraqi territory, it is a cause for increase of a concern for the continuation of the conflict and its related developments, not only military, but especially politicians . Formally, the Turkish initiative takes place on foreign territory of a sovereign state, which has not given the green light at the entrance of foreign troops, and Ankara is violating international law, no more, no less of Russia, as Moscow when implemented the invasion of the Crimea and in the operations carried out in Eastern Ukraine. The episode certainly contribute to the confusion in the alliance against the Islamic Republic and will also generate new conflicts between those who say they are committed to fighting the caliphate, as happened between Turkey and Russia. Ankara appears increasingly as an unpredictable variable in the conflict and increasingly committed to fighting outside the general objective to pursue their own particular interests, which are to prevent development of the Kurdish part on its territory. The mission of the military Erdogan has the official task to train and assist Iraqi Kurdish fighters, with whom we have good relations, but in fact the real intention is to interpose between them and the Kurds of Turkey, to avoid any possibility union. For the fighters of Iraqi Kurdistan, the true ground force committed against men of the caliphate of the help that comes is welcome, but in the general alliance of Turkish meddling threatens to aggravate the Iraqi government, which, it should be remembered, is expression of the Shiites in the country and consequently Iran, which is its main ally. From Iran to Russia the step is short: the two countries are allies to maintain an important role in the regime in Damascus, in view of a conference that will decide the future of Syria, unwelcome option to Turkey and Saudi Arabia. One of the additional problems, because not immediate but full of political consequences, is that the Turkish move may not have been implemented without approval, even unofficial, the US, which, at the time, see press deployed ground troops against the caliphate, as a priority objective to win the war. Obama does not want to deploy effective American and identified, with the agreement of the members of the Atlantic Alliance, the methodology to deploy ground troops that have religious affinities and common origin with the radical party. However, the impression is that it is left too much space to a Turkey, which is characterized by dangerous driving and not in line with the aims of the Alliance. Being a member of the Atlantic Alliance should not allow Ankara to implement dangerous maneuvers for political balance very fragile, with the sole aim of protecting their own interests. Turkey has failed, for now, to get into Europe because of the failure to respect the rules of coexistence, the criteria of association in NATO are no less rigid, but they should not allow to endanger the unity of the coalition behavior over common sense. The US is engaged in a difficult relationship with Russia and Iran, but have an interest that the two countries actively participate to a joint coordination against the caliphate, also the agreement with Iraq is undeniable and Washington will have to find Bagdad with a form of explanation for the Turkish meddling. The picture of the situation is certainly aggravated and this lack of unity is likely to benefit the Islamic state, which is to enjoy a comparable situation to start occurred in Syria, where it is able to thrive because of the lack of unity of the groups They opposed to Assad; Now this scenario is likely to be repeated on an international scale.