Against Islamic terrorism requires deeper analysis

The greatest weakness that seems to emerge from terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists is the absence of a vision and a more profound analysis, which goes beyond the threat and quota effects and that can not take into consideration the highest level of where actions originate. It remains impossible to believe that the power of the Islamic State group, is created out of nothing and finance by selling illegal oil, as well as hardly it seems possible that the caliphate has strategists of the first magnitude and networks as well capillaries. Meanwhile, we must not separate ever, the overall analysis of Islamic terrorism the bond present between the Islamic State and European bombers; this bond is secure and does not apply to the relevant phenomena, Europe with Al Qaeda, which seems to move into other areas of the planet. With this you should not underestimate Al Qaeda, but we must focus more on who is behind the Islamic state and what are the real objectives. The press this argument does not seem to be sufficiently taken into consideration while governments silence is more understandable why could invest delicate diplomatic relations. The relief to the public is to warn people against the state of terror and insecurity that the terrorists want to create, but the analysis will stop at this point; conversely it should be developed to try to understand the real objectives of those who are at the top of the pyramid of terror. First of all we should understand if behind the bombers there were foreign, financial groups or elements beyond the control of those who used them for other geopolitical purposes. The situations of marginalization present in certain neighborhoods can be a justification that holds only up to a certain point, in other cultural exclusion zone has turned into crime, without resulting in terrorism. The presence of highly oriented to the radical religious organizations seems to be a decisive factor in creating the conditions necessary to develop a proselytizing in this sense, however, without the existence of a network and a greater coordination, it seems unlikely that religious extremism accomplishes the leap into terrorism. If these religious centers, then, are able to make up for the lack of social assistance, need finance, on which it would be good to establish with certainty the origin and provenance. It is a first step that can frame the person who has an interest in this type of operation that prefers the Salafist values, so the more extremists than more moderate. Finding this information is not yet sufficient to understand the direction of the phenomenon, but it can direct you to a greater understanding. If we take as true the identity Salafi orientation with terrorism, we can not contemplate the analysis of what are the countries where this version of Islam rises to political element and government, not to mention those states, that while proclaiming moderate , operate a contraction of civil and social rights and, at the same time, they are governed by parties that have a very strong religious connotation. The next question is the reason for this action, if it is still a strategy in place or if there is an ambiguous and dangerous use of these forces, that can escape those who think they control them. The ambition of wanting to extend Islamic religious proselytism stiffer currents in Europe can be the basis of this scenario, a proselytism pursued without too much concern about what could happen and for any consequences, of which, at some point you It has lost control. But this is not enough to fuel terrorism without adequate funding and also a paramilitary training, that even the rigid interpretation of the Koran can provide. The states and the European and Western governments should ask ourselves what power nations to safely rely, above all, in a context of heavy uncertainty as to global balances and monitor with precision the flow of money coming from certain parts of the planet, because even finance it can be a vector of aid to terrorism; There is therefore the need to investigate both from the side of the real attacks, but, perhaps, it is even more important to understand how these can take place. Then they will need to make significant diplomatic steps, they must be made without delay.