The Balkan route for migrants, toward closure

Therefore, the Balkan route is becoming more difficult for the migrants and, indeed, will probably intended to close or become secondary. The pressure of the Eastern European countries, already protagonists of migratory waves in the not so distant past, led by right-wing governments, hostile to the division of issues between the European Union, but favorable to receive their respective financial contributions, seems have the best intentions in Brussels and Germany pushing for greater solidarity, both to the migrants themselves, who to European countries placed on the borders of the union. Likely to favor the victory of the Eastern countries are at the base, economic reasons, very convenient for Berlin and also geopolitical reasons, which are not intended to promote a shift of these nations toward a Russian influence; In fact, despite the much-publicized fear of Moscow's return it appears undeniable that the Kremlin has considerable interests to expand its influence within the European Union, and therefore, indirectly, going to provoke the US, through economic arguments. In fact, the eastern countries do not intend to repeat the experience of partnership with Russia, but they use this argument as a weapon of blackmail whenever they need to assume their responsibilities and duties, which have signed when they entered to make part of Brussels. Threats of some members of the government to stop European aid, thanks to which these countries are thriving, were perceived as blackmail to which it is impossible to obey, knowing full well that these threats were left on the paper. The bureaucrats of Brussels is nothing left but look for alternative solutions to the problem of migrants involving Turkey, Macedonia and Greece promising more help. The European Athens area risks becoming a huge refugee camp, without having the economic capacity of the management of the phenomenon; Brussels and Berlin, however, seem willing, to exploit the objective Greek weakness for download of Athens, just because the greek village is situated at the Union's borders, the reception tasks and maintaining the most refugees, engaging only in aid economic. The absolute difference in treatment that is given to Greece is a prime example of the lack of mutuality and the division of issues between the member states, encouraging those who raise their voices and are obviously guilty of not sharing the principles that form the basis of 'European Union. On top of that the closure of the Balkan route, and the refusal of the refugee division, threatening Italy, which has already overseeing the Union's southern borders, without the aid due, because it could open up a route aiming to tap the Adriatic Sea with the route from Albania to the coast of Puglia. This is the route that the Albanians used to escape from the communist regime and land, precisely in Italy. If this hypothesis were to occur around the problem of migrants would become a thing discharged on two border countries, Greece and Italy, which should handle an intolerable situation because of the imbalance in the division of the problem. Also to avoid this scenario, the European Union is forced to deal with a regime, which at this time is far away from the principles of Brussels, but not too far away from Hungary and other Eastern countries. The intention is to finance Turkey for you to retain migrants on its territory and armies a sentinel role of European borders. Brussels entrusted this role to a state whose government stifles civil rights and clears the press freedom within its territory and it does not seem, therefore, represent the necessary guarantees to accommodate those fleeing from war and famine. Furthermore, Turkey does not do this just for economic self-interest, but it points to a political result, in the short term it is to ensure greater freedom of movement for its citizens and to its goods in the Union, but that in the medium term is It consists in reaching the green light to become a member country of Brussels. If the EU will transfer to this instance, carried out by a suspected government to have funded the Islamic state, only to satisfy his own designs on Syria and eradicate the Kurds, it will be taking a much bigger danger than the one represented by terrorist threats current. We hope that in Brussels adequately reflect before making this choice.