France under attack of Islamic terrorism

After so unscathed the manifestation of the European Football Championship, France is hit immediately after the day of the country's national holiday. This time the target is not Paris, but Nice, French tourist city of the south. Certainly the significance of the attack, for those who have made and who has the celebrated was to be celebrated in the symbolic date of France, a date but also goes beyond national borders, for what it represents: the very antithesis the reason for being and existence of movements such as the Islamic state or in any case of intolerance and political and religious fanaticism. So the date was not chosen at random, why carry out an attack on July 14 means will claim to be contrary to the values ​​of freedom and tolerance, which are denied as universal values ​​and fought as identified with the hated West. But beyond the symbolic aspect is the tragic of the dead, which is immediate, emergency present and the future, which aims to take French country under a constant pressure through repetition of bloody attacks and the threat of their occurrence in order to block the normal continuity of the development of the life of the citizens of the country. At this time France pays the price of a foreign policy that has seen the commitment against Muslim fundamentalists in different theaters of war, primarily those where Paris has its interests outside the national borders. Hollande's conduct has not always been linear, because, at times, wanted to risk their own initiative and not coordinated with other countries, exposing themselves to the fierce criticism of the fundamentalists that has morphed into a violent reaction carried out by French territory. It must specify that France, despite its conventional military power, does not seem to have a force of equal value in it are able to anticipate or contain episodes of difficult evaluation. To this we must add that the army of the so-called lone wolves, urged to actions like those of Nice by several authorities of international religious terrorism, it appears potentially unlimited. Now is the real crux of the problem: the current France pays a high price for a protracted situation, where you are not wanted to address the issue of integration of second and third generations of citizens of North African origin, who populate her peripheries and are prey exclusion and social distress, going to be a fertile ground for those violent and fundamentalist preachers are able to find these excluded a kind of identity in which to recognize. There are several cases that constitute a real paradox of French citizens who hate France, where they were born and lived, and recognize organizations in places where they never even been. This problem is certainly not the immediate solution and provides, with fully dedicated policies, a solution that goes beyond the average time to arrive, perhaps, the extended period; it is clear that in such a situation the only weapon is a lockout prevention where safety devices leave nothing to chance and you can not see a commitment and involvement of very substantial resources. From the point of view of the trend of the international fight against Caliphate appears the occurrence of a directly proportional relationship between the conventional military defeat of the Islamic state and its resort to bombings to move the clash in a positive direction (to the caliphate) outside the territories of battle. Replace with the success of the attacks, which occurred recently in France, Iraq, Bangladesh, military defeats in Iraq and Syria is the only way to keep alive the same struggle for affirmation of Islamic terrorism, which moves to a new land, with new fighters and even new resolutions. If you have to abandon the ambition to exercise its sovereignty over well-defined portions of the territory, there is no alternative to embrace the mode of submission to terror as much as possible to enemy states. In such a scenario, Europe, France, like Belgium, it appears the place where it is easier and cheaper to exercise this strategy, precisely for the reasons described above, which should constitute an elemental analysis, are the basis of the reasoning those who incite the attacks. The strategic value of so-called lone wolf is a huge asset for those who do not have big media, especially in foreign countries, these bombers can only be mobilized by propaganda and, at most, with the supply of weapons and explosives, that cost infinitely less than an armed wagon or training crack troops. So, while it should not be lowered their guard against terrorist organizations and the possibility of infiltration in the area, greater attention should be given to the control of potentially dangerous isolated individuals: definitely a lot of work, but that is, at least at the moment the only prevention able to stop the attacks of the type of those of Nice. Surely greater collaboration between European forces is desirable, until the creation of a single police force dedicated to the prevention of these phenomena, but get out of Europe, but right now most of the work must be done by France because it is the most exposed to a phenomenon, which appears to be the internal array.