Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
martedì 19 luglio 2016
The international repercussions of the situation in Turkey
The
doubts and anomalies on the attempted coup was turkish they continue to
increment and indicate the possibility of an action designed desk to
allow Erdogan to cancel opponents present in the state machinery. Indeed,
the ways of carrying out the coup have raised more than a doubt on the
real organizational abilities of those who led the and the blacklisting
ready constitute an additional factor of suspicion. Of
course the conspiracy theory is always the most difficult to prove, but
it is clear that the attempt of the coup, was being carried out in too
amateurish to have even the slightest success rate. If
it is clear that many people may not have given to interpret a role of
appearance and victims testify to the violence of the fighting, the
perception is that an attempt to remove the power to Erdogan, there was,
but it was not too shared and it seemed almost expected, if not encouraged, then defeat him better. If you think who benefits this situation, one can not but admit that the only one to gain advantages is its president turkish. Meanwhile,
his level of popularity in a country where information is almost
completely standardized, it is in large growth in the population and
this approval will only be used to carry out his project to transform
the way in a presidential government system of the country. Then
there is the question of opponents, including the armed forces was one
of the major groups, if not the major, averse to Erdogan, which do not
share the religious setting of the state, in this supported by wide
circles of the judiciary: no is no coincidence that these two parts of the state are the most affected by the purges of Ankara. The
speed with which the arrests highlights the fact that the lists of
those who do not share Erdogan's line were ready for some time, so have
not been necessary investigations to get to the ones that are presented
as traitors to the country have been made. This
whole scenario favors Erdogan internally, where you create the final
terms to a greater concentration of power in his hands, an objective
that the turkish president pursues long. The
most important problems for the international scenario, are those that
involve the acceleration towards more and more power to Erdogan, as
regards relations with other states, with the European Union, the
Atlantic Alliance and to the evolution that is taking the Middle East scenario. Turkey
Erdogan has from the beginning held an ambiguous attitude towards the
Islamic state, alongside Saudi Arabia in an implicit support of the
caliphate: the current tide of the war see the Islamists go to the loss
of sovereignty of the territory they had conquered and
for joint action by Russia and the United States, both for ground
battles waged by the Iraqi army, the Kurds and the Shiites, for both the
disappearance of the support of Ankara forced by Washington to take a
different attitude on problem of the caliphate. However,
these developments are favoring Assad, whose fall was the goal that
justified the support of the Islamic state and, at the same time, the
rise of the consideration of the Kurds, whose intent is to collect US
support for the constitution of
their sovereign state, for their participation in the conflict on the
ground, avoiding the use of American troops in the war zones. These
factors added together mean Erdogan's defeat of all its goals in
international politics and the decision would make it unusable to the
United States, the Turkish base from where they rode the air raids
against the caliphate is quite eloquent; to
this must be added the reaction against late pronouncement of
condemnation of the coup by Obama and the charge of protecting the
American homeland dissident turkish blamed by Erdogan of masterminding
the coup. We
are so in front of the lowest point in relations between Ankara and
Washington, where even the membership of Turkey to the Atlantic Alliance
can be doubted. Aside
from all the considerations on the strategic and political presence of
Ankara in the biggest Western military structure, also in the unique
position of the Islamic state, the problem for the White House, is
whether it is still convenient to have among its allies a country He governed by an untrustworthy character like Erdogan. If this scenario is quite clear, it is less the rapprochement towards Putin. Russia,
it should be remembered, has as its primary objective in the Middle
East to keep Assad in power, the exact opposite of that of Erdogan, but
to the president turkish is even more priority to avoid the creation of a
Kurdish state, a requirement that does not fall among those of the Kremlin where you can find points of contact. For
Putin the chance to create a rift in the Atlantic Alliance, is too
great a chance to let it escape, why deprive the Alliance of the
garrison on the Black Sea could give substantial benefits even in the
performance of the Ukrainian conflict. As you see both Erdogan, Putin have substantial reasons to find points of contact, convenient to both. It
remains for the President turkish the problem of relations with the
European Union if Ankara still has the weapon of blackmail of Syrian
refugees, for which he received six billion, or otherwise, in general,
to stop human trafficking towards' Europe
with the blockade of the Balkan route, the attitude taken by Erdogan to
the coup leaders, which shows a total disregard for human rights, it
blocks virtually all possibility of negotiations with Brussels. There
is a fundamental error of Europe, which has never been entirely clear
in opposing a refusal to Turkey for the failure to adhere to the
standards required in the field of civil liberties and rights, and this
is due to the attitude German too busy to consider only the economic benefits of a supranational European organization Ankara entrance. This
can be an opportunity to establish clear limits to have relations with
Brussels and at the same time, to review, the agreements made with what
is in fact a regime from which we should stay as far away as possible. But
Erdogan once again shows to go ahead with political hazards, result of
the capitalization of a divided union and unable to express to know a
single line of conduct and, at this time, also weakened from the UK. President
turkish has not abandoned the idea of an entrance, albeit gradually
in Europe, but he wants to accomplish by winning the domestic front rid
of all opposition and capable of even more so exercise his power to
blackmail. For
the European Union it is time to alone handle the immigration
emergency, no awkward allies that inevitably will present the bill; this
must also be done by forcing recalcitrant members to take charge of the
problem, otherwise drastic cuts in funding and even expulsion. This way you will be able to break off relations with Erdogan and regain his consistency.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento