The Islamic state exports religious intolerance in Europe

The attack in France, took place in a Catholic church, a place of worship, is a factor for further growth terrorist action, because happened in Europe, where it had never happened, but it is not new: in fact the Islamic state in the invasion of Syrian and Iraqi territories desecrated in a similar way and even worse other places of worship, not only Christians, but also Yazidis, Shiites and Sunnis who did not identify it identified with the caliphate. The French action of Islamic fundamentalists seem to want to export to the continent this conduct more complete intolerance towards other religions, transforming terrorism in constant threat to the rights and freedoms, including the religious one, in fact. One way to increase the pressure on Western countries and expose them to constant danger of attacks in different places, to exacerbate the sense of insecurity in the population. Certainly the symbolic value of this attack is very different because it does accomplish the terrorist act in a place of worship of the religion that the men of the Caliphate have always identified as a symbol of the West, much to call them crusaders. You can talk about religious war? Probably the intention of the caliphate is precisely that, however, the expression appears improper because it defines a state that covers a fraction of Muslims, rather the perception is that the will to apply symbology to the terrorist attack that want to hit the beliefs of others, especially the West, to enhance functional potential similar actions and at the same time, move the discussion on the contempt of the Christian religion as a means to find other martyrs to be sacrificed to the cause of Islamic terrorism. It is undeniable that the charm of the attack carried out in the name of Islam and performed within a church can be a sort of more attractive to new bombers. The rest of the caliphate needs actions with high media impact, both directed against their enemies, which direct to your extension, at a time when the sovereignty over the territories conquered in the Middle East is slowly running out. From one point of view, this signal is the difficulty of the Islamic state in maintaining its role of Islamic fundamentalism guide, hired their own with the ability to obtain by military means the control of vast territories. This peculiarity, which has characterized the action, is the one that allowed him to overtake Al Qaeda in the ranking of the importance of extremist organizations. Hence the appeal to the attacks can only be identified as a fallback; but the danger is all in to this observation: if, on the one hand, the caliphate is defeated on the battlefield and can no longer exercise their sovereignty, the other still needs to maintain its leadership by raising the level of confrontation to outside of their territories, with bombings increasingly egregious and wide media coverage. Paradoxically the military defeat of the Islamic state in Middle Eastern territories has increased the threat to the European public; the caliphate in Europe can count on the return of fighters from the war zones, who have military training, but also suicide bombers recruited locally between young Muslims and often not integrated from the local underworld. Although two distinct categories, in both cases, the hazard rate and unpredictability is very high. An additional factor of danger for the Christian churches is the fact that they make every effort to accommodate the refugees, even those Muslims, filling the void left by the state institutions. For the vision fundamentalist this aid is inconceivable both from the side of those who provide, either by the person who receives it, whether directed against Muslims. This evolution poses practical order reflections for the prevention of other possible attacks, such as to extend the danger in a practically infinite dimension. Leaving out Italy and Spain, the only French Catholic churches are more than 47,000 and now, they can all be considered as a possible target. France certainly appears the most vulnerable country, because its safety has already shown the flaws of no small account, but from this you should take the wide availability of personnel who potentially terrorism can take hold, this in the suburbs. For European countries highlights once more the need for a more structured coordination at supranational level, able to offer an adequate response in a repressive way, but especially in a preventive way with intelligence and police actions; However, this solution appears only as an emergency remedy, which can not be used indefinitely without the support of an action of social type, capable of eliminating the sense of loss that belongs to big social-end: the one that constitutes the tank fundamentalism recruitment.