The European Union countries are meeting in Bratislava

The summit in Bratislava between representatives of the EU countries, will be the first after the London outlet and also the first without Britain as a participant. The question is not only symbolic, because the majority of UK voters showed a malaise that has also affected other states on the European continent. This is the perception, widely proven by concrete aspects, the distance of the European institutions by the people who are supposed to represent, which was achieved with a reduced quality of life of average citizens, due to the lack or insufficient answers that were given by ' European Union against the economic crisis. Why, if it is a fact, that the current historical period has been crossed by the economic crisis brought huge, it is equally true that the instruments adopted by the states, almost always on indications of the European Union authorities, have had as its central objective the defense of the financial and banking institutions, often guilty of bad management, too marked by a speculative address, which ended up becoming large parts of the causes of the economic crisis. The European Union is also distinguished by an excessive rate of bureaucracy, which combined with the lack of tangible decisions to benefit the population, led to a general mistrust, which has exceeded the sectors already skeptical of Brussels, to find even consensus on the social partners traditionally favorable to Brussels. What should happen in Bratislava, it should be the introduction of a phase of reflection on these and other topics, through which recovered more trust in the European institutions, so as to prevent the current real danger of electoral statements of political parties contrary to the union in the next appointments to the vote, which will include several nation states. To do that you need in a concrete work on tangible issues, but the commitment is difficult for the large differences that occur between member states. One of the most immediate issues has been identified in the generalized fear of international terrorism and the dangers associated with immigration. In fact, these fears are their most of the states of Central Europe, which have violated the common rules, refusing to take charge of the shares to which they are entitled to migrants. On the contrary to these violations should be constructed of sanctions, in order to adequately respond to those who break the rules of the union, it would be a first step to re-establish a principle of fairness between the states, especially among those with different geographic location. The proposals on these issues, however, are difficult conciliation with the conditions which the Union is based: prohibit migration is not only historical but also anti hardly feasible. Certainly in an armed patrol the borders can be a deterrent in the short term can work, but against war, hunger and climate change, which generate despair the problem can not only be addressed with weapons. In this regard, the debate becomes even larger, because prevention of migration requires a great political and military capabilities, the subject Europe, of which Brussels is still lacking. This lack denotes a heavy delay on programs and by great power, which are required not to suffer the effects of acts caused by others. For without a common army, able to intervene in crisis areas with high possibility of resolution of conflicts, the only diplomatic phase is no longer sufficient; the abandonment of London, to resolve this situation seems providential, because it removes the country from increasingly opposed to this. Of course do without the British military force lowers the ability of a possible European army, but this deficiency can be resolved with a specialization in the intervention in crisis areas. It is clear that the political will must be strong, as well as investments in which no country can be waived. Another fundamental chapter will interpret a different policy on budget constraints, to allow more expansionary policies, able to reverse the trend and ensure the growth rates needed to do down the continental economy. Also in this area we are lacking clear rules and the general situation clashes with the special interests of some countries, especially the German one, which persist in an attitude of self-protection too obvious. Having identified the need to harmonize the tax rules in all countries to prevent and recover the escape of large multinational companies, certainly a starting point, even political, but it is not enough to ensure economic recovery, which must then be maintained, with political decisions taken in a short time, this decision speed is currently impossible because of cumbersome regulations that favor the prevalence of particular interests of the general ones. Start a discussion on this issue becomes a priority need and not be derogated. As it has been shown to become more and more necessary legislation regulates the inclusion and also the possible expulsion of countries that want to be EU member. The question of who violates basic principles such as social rights, must become a subject on which to legislate certain measures, which not only provide warnings without consequences. The behavior of governments like Hungary can not be allowed and no changes should also provide that a state is to be expelled. The time of inclusion at all costs, maybe pursued to meet the commercial ambitions of a single state, it must be set aside in order to impose more rigid criteria for admission in the union. It is only a few steps, which could turn the tide of skepticism towards Europe, and then allow them to develop even more political. From what will happen in Bratislava you can judge and predict the future of the European Union.