England in early elections to deal with Europe

With the dissolution of the parliament in London, the electoral campaign that the English Premier has explicitly wanted to get a strong mandate from the electorate with the aim of treating, with very strong internal positions, with Brussels the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union . At this early stage of the election campaign, polls seem to be all in favor of the outgoing premier, however, the date of the elections is still far away and it should be remembered that the predominant theme, if not the only one, of the same campaign will be how to agree on the conditions for 'Exit from Europe. Recalling the close ratios that have resulted in the outcome of the referendum, it is not excluded that some electoral force can seek consensus by expressly basing its own electoral program on the reasons it has been and is still opposed to the abandonment of Brussels. A program, however, can not be part of the Conservatives, which have been erected by representatives of Europe's exit guides, although not the whole party seems compact on the subject. More uncertain and shadowed the position of Laborers, also due to internal labor due to the low consensus of who is the party's main office. Jeremy Corbin is an exponent of the wing of the extreme left of the party, but during the referendum campaign he kept an ambiguous attitude, which at times seemed to coincide with advocates of leaving the union, probably for a vision that depicts the " Europe as an expression of finance. This vision, however, is strongly opposed by Corbin's internal opponents, but the perception provided by the Labor Party is not entirely trustworthy on how to counteract the exit, despite Tony Blair's statement, hoping for a return to English Within the European Union. Maybe the Liberal Party might have more chance of presenting itself as an alternative to the conservative one on the European theme. Nor is it possible to exclude new developments, such as the emergence of new political formations, precisely because of the need to have a strong follow-up to counteract the outgoing premier and try to overturn the referendum outcome. Despite the security of May, London will be forced to pay what is due to Europe, an account of about sixty billion euros, and above all as a pretext for negotiating negotiations on how relations between the two sides are defined; As opposed to what London would prefer. The thought that a strong government, if the outcome of the elections allows it, can get more favorable conditions, does not seem to have an effective correspondence: Europe of the twenty-seven countries remaining in the union has found a unanimous agreement, as rare times It has happened, on the conduct to be held against London and will hardly be able to retreat in the face of the attitude it has proposed to maintain with England. May must have perceived that European goals are unlikely to change and he immediately accused Brussels of wanting to influence the English election campaign with those he called threats. This gimmick can only get more rigidity from Brussels, which can not derogate from what it has to do under the treaties in force. In fact, the lack of negotiating margins seems to have surprised the British premier, as well as those citizens who did not understand what would happen with the victory of the solution for leaving Europe and, in spite of everything, They had leaned in the electoral booth. Whatever the executive will come from the result of the urns, the British country will have to prepare for a change dictated by the exit from Europe, which will probably change the way of life and its quality to the worst, with an internal situation that will become difficult For Scottish and Irish issues, the reconstruction of a production fabric that will no longer benefit from the common market. England has left its manufacturing sector in favor of the financial one, which has thrived in a drug way just for European facilities: the future will be to reinvent an economy without more safeguards: then it will serve as a strong government of popular consensus That, in the negotiations with Brussels, on the contrary, does not seem to be useful.