Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
martedì 16 maggio 2017
France and Germany for a new Europe
That
the election of the new French president interrupted that negative
strip for Europe, which began with the UK exit from Brussels and
continued with Trump's proclamation at the US presidency, appears to be a
definite fact. The
new French president immediately moved to reinforce this trend, as a
first act of his mandate, a visit to Berlin, to recreate the closest
alliance in Europe with Angela Merkel's Germany. The
German Chancellor was, moreover, reassured by the popularity of the
German people, thanks to the results of the administrative elections,
which saw a clear statement of his political training against the
Socialists, which seemed to be on the rise. This
election result puts Merkel in the net in the upcoming German
elections, opening the way for its fourth government mandate. The
meeting, therefore, was among two leading leaders in their respective
countries and strong in consensus that could authorize them to design a
new design for the European Union. We
are in the face of a new leadership, which Germany wants to share with
France, above all, not to be identified as the sole responsible for
European politics and hence being accused of the excessive rigor that
has been imposed on the acceding countries. This
does not mean that Germany intends to move from its path, only to share
its responsibilities with a partner who is believed to be reliable and
able to make Berlin's proposals effective. In
view of this, the perception is of a Germany that is still firmly in
control of European politics, and in a sense it is true, because the new
tenant of the Eliseo seems to be co-opted in this political vision, but
the new president French
will have to do something, at least in terms of institutional change,
to give it credit for developing the current euro area structure. The
President of the French Republic argues that, as is the case with the
architecture of the single currency, it is incomplete, because it lacks a
common direction shared by the member states. This
address necessarily presupposes a transfer of sovereignty from the
national states to a central European authority that can govern the
union's economy through a European budget capable of directing the
growth of less developed countries, with the adoption of investments special. It
is understood that this direction goes in the opposite direction to
that of those movements that are against the sale of sovereignty of
their own countries, of which the principal representative is Marine Le
Pen. However,
without the spread of wealth and a real redistribution, the French
president is likely to attract, in the European field, the criticisms
that have been made during the French election campaign, namely to be
the expression of banks and finance. After
the euphoria for the failure of the rise of the far-right and
anti-European Le Pen movement, the new French president might find
himself in the unwelcome position of making the financial interests and
quickly exhausting the credit granted by public opinion and ending thus Like a Hollande any. On
the other hand, Merkel is still not sure of the electoral victory,
though favored, and can not make the transfer of funds to southern
European countries to boost its growth. The
German Chancellor must give security to his constituents to still have
the power to condition the union, because for the Germans a sale of
sovereignty in favor of Brussels can only mean a less rigid balance
sheet and hence a lower value of German savings . If
there really is this hypothetical EU economy ministry, it will not have
to be a hostage-taking institution, but act as a protagonist for
continental growth and be able to reverse the trend that has heightened
the deep inequality in Europe; Only
in this way will it be possible to create the real assumptions to try
to reach even more ambitious goals as a single military force until it
reaches political union. To
do this, the relationship between Berlin and Paris should not be
exclusive, but widened as far as possible to other governments, who
really share these goals, leaving those who are in the European Union
only for convenience and without sharing the ideals Brussels establishes its own existence.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento