The judgment of the European Court of Justice, starting point for a new Union

The ruling of the European Court of Justice, rejecting the appeal of the eastern countries against the acceptance of the refugees, makes the position of violation of Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic a violation of the provisions of Brussels. The fact, above all legal, is, above all, political: because it implies that the four countries have not recognized European central political structures in the name of sovereignty, which contrasts with what is signed up to the entry into the union. There comes, that is, officially sanctioned what constitutes a clear violation, in particular of the agreements and in general of the same constitutive spirit of the union. Specifically, the judgment states that the refugee redistribution mechanism adopted by the European Council, in order to alleviate the pressure of Italy and Greece, had been constructed fairly, thanks to the calculation carried out in a fair and proportional manner, that the princes that generated the decision was based on the principle of solidarity, both for refugees and with the aim of dividing the emergency between the countries of the union. The practical implications of this pronouncement, as requested, should be remembered once again by the nations that belonged to the Warsaw Pact, should be the distribution of refugees also in the countries of eastern Europe; in the event of failure to comply with this Court's ruling, the defaulting countries would incur heavy fines calculated on the basis of every day that refusals to refugees were refused. Indeed, it was also supposed to intervene with heavy cuts in the contributions the European Union has allocated to these countries and on which their rates of economic growth are based. An example for Poland last year was about 90 billion euros, which is essential for maintaining the country. The reactions of three of the eastern countries, except Slovakia, whose government said they wanted to comply with the provisions of the Court, were deeply opposed and arrogant to the European institutions, leading to the climax of a political case exasperated by the behavior adopted until now from these nations. The European Court verdict has to become a starting point for issuing regulations capable of managing the life of the union and handling disputes in a certain way. It is not permissible for those who want to be part of Europe and freely subscribe to the principles, once admitted, they raise exceptions and violate the regulations, according to the political orientation of the government in office. Finally, it is necessary to put in place automatic sanction mechanisms that effectively penalize those who, by acting in violation of existing laws, endanger the stability of the union. Not only must there be periodic checks on the compliance of national laws with European principles, which must not be in any way contradictory. Recent cases of the suppression of freedom of the press in Hungary and the limitation of political rights in other eastern countries can not be allowed within the European perimeter and the almost condescending attitude of Brussels must change to avoid dangerous drifts. The Court's verdict allows the Council and the European Parliament to accelerate in this direction, which must be supported transversally by different political forces, but which are recognized in the European project. What must be overcome, within the European Union is the phase of inclusion, almost at all cost, of countries that are geographically on the continent, that is to say, the only geographic requirement is not sufficient, but very standard is needed raised in terms of guaranteeing and enforcing the rights and sharing of the founding principles of the union. Regular audits on each member will have to serve this purpose: having quality adherents that meet high and high requirements that go beyond the financial standards that have so far been adopted. This should also lead to the prediction of mechanisms that may go from disruption to expulsion from Europe. This is a logical consequence, which must protect the countries that follow the precepts of Brussels and the same survival of the European Union.