Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
giovedì 21 dicembre 2017
Brussels could withdraw the right to vote to Poland
The
decision to put into practice the device envisaged by Article Seven of
the European Union treaty is new and is destined to create a significant
precedent in the relations between European states and the central
bodies of the Union. The
European Commission has decided to proceed on this path, after several
warnings to Poland, as many as three recommendations, twenty-five
letters and several meetings between the two parties, which have always
been disregarded. The
facts say that Warsaw has implemented more than thirty legislative
measures that have compromised the independence of the Polish judiciary,
including the most relevant organs, such as the Constitutional Court,
Supreme Court, Council of the Magistrature up to the ordinary courts. Furthermore,
the Polish government is exerting pressure on the printing organs of
the country, with the clear intention of stifling any form of
disagreement and therefore with the aim of compressing the freedom of
the press, which has always been considered a necessary element for
being part of the organization of Brussels. The final result for Poland should be the loss of voting rights within the Union. However, this is not an automatic procedure, despite the fact that the violations are clear and obvious; the activation mechanism of article seven envisages, in fact, two phases, a preventive and a sanction; for
the approval of the first a quorum of four fifths among the members of
the Council is required for the ascertainment of the serious violation
of article two of the treaty: and at this moment it seems that the
orientation of the members of the council is to activate the preventive procedure of article seven. Once
this first part is over, we need the proposal to activate the
sanctioning phase by a third of the member states or the European
Commission, with the approval of the European Parliament, finally the
vote takes place in the Council where, to be approved, it must achieve unanimity of votes. This eventuality should not, however, occur because Hungary has already announced that its vote will be against. Budapest
has a government that is also under observation, for violations similar
to those of Warsaw and could be subjected to the same procedure, also
Poland and Hungary are aligned on different subjects, such as the
rejection of the distribution of migrants, which puts them in open contrast with Brussels. In
truth what is emerging is a clash between the founding part of the
Union and the group of Visegrad, which, in addition to Poland and
Hungary, also includes Slovakia and the Czech Republic, all countries
belonging to the former Soviet bloc and who of
substantial contributions from Brussels, taking a hostile attitude on
the division of emergencies and now also no longer respecting the
Accession Treaty in its fundamental principles. The
will of Paris and Berlin, although lacking a national government, to
sanction the violation of the treaty is clear and is also followed by
Italy and Spain: what is foreshadowed is a clash of mentality that,
until now, was confined to the lack
of official status and that from now it becomes an official precedent
and that can start in the future an even heavier sanctioning process, in
order not to admit so heavy violations of the common rules. If
this path is taken, presumably there will be a clash between the
advocates of national sovereignty, and then it will be possible to
encourage the aggregation of the movements into account the union, and
those who are inclined towards a European Union increasingly bound by
common bonds, which forces from the sale of shares of national sovereignty always greater over time. This
may be an opportunity to make effective membership of Europe on the
principles of mutual development and not of pure and exclusive
convenience; but
this must be shared by citizenship, which will no longer have to
perceive union as an institution fallen from on high, but as a body
capable of improving the life of the European peoples by improving the
condition and quality of life.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento