The plan of Islamic fundamentalism is to unite the countries of the Arab Spring

Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, the former head of Al Qaeda in Iraq, is the person that announced the merger of the group Al Nusra fighter in Syria, just with Al Qaeda, declaring that the task of training operating in Syrian territory is to join the country to the Islamic State of Iraq. Of course, for now, it is a long-term project: the Syrian situation is still far from the solution and in Iraq, despite a thousand difficulties, the state organization took over from Saddam Hussein fails with a lot of effort to survive. However, signs of a highway to the spread of states of Muslims, which reveals how this project has become the pre-eminent of the most extremist of the Arab world. Al Baghdadi warned the Syrian people that replacing a dictatorship with an unjust democracy is a solution equally negative. The words of this terrorist leader are shared by a growing number of people belonging to the Arab people: the concept of democracy is identified as exclusively Western value, and especially contrary to Islamic law, non-compatible, that is, the way of life of the Arab countries . The strict religious observance, unconsciously favored dictatorships as a refuge alternative to the hardships imposed by the regimes, has led to the need for freedom from tyrants, but not the need for a secular political system based on the importance of universal rights, able to develop an attitude the creation of forms of democratic state. Also where you get to liberation from dictatorships, with the opposition forces united enough, voting democratic countries have addressed to governments of confessional matrix, which then overturned plants democratic painstakingly built. It is no coincidence that Al Baghdadi has explicitly indicated Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, where the Arab people as a democratic institution has been exceeded, like the dictatorship, a vision in which Islamic law has become central. Eyes, not just a western, but also a secular Arab, this step is, however, only the mere transition from a regime of political to a religious, frustrating and humiliating intense struggle of the people who fought for a more equal society. But perhaps this analysis is done by taking as determinants only some values ​​than others, but in Islamic law that is applied in the Arab revolutions coming from, there is the protection of minorities, the female figure is overshadowed and religious leaders have a power that no one entrusted to him. These data seem so obvious and yet contains the error that made all Western governments when they are deployed, rightly, against the Arab regimes: to have underestimated the impact of religion in the people who were raised. Ayman al-Zawahiri, the current leader of Al Qaeda, has called on all countries of the Arab Spring to join jihadist forming an Islamic state, arguing that if the efforts and sacrifices made should lead to democracies, this would be a theft of the West holy wars for liberation from tyranny. This is an extreme argument, but until now had never been done due to lack of fertile land, now, on the contrary, the rising tide of proselytism, which unfortunately has to be admitted, the regimes hindered effectively allows widely. Even without going to the extreme excess preached by the leader of Al Qaeda, the spread of the validity of Islamic law as the regulator dela life of the state, poses serious obstacles to its relations with Western countries, these have taken a soft attitude towards the theocracies in the hope of attenuating tones to achieve a sustainable coexistence, yet they have already presented several cases of contrast that does not bode well for the future. Can not seem obvious that a vision even remotely close, as is already the case, that the leader of Al Qaeda can lead to a variety of situations ranging from mutual isolation until the war north versus south of the world, through the religious conflict . In the long run, however, it seems impossible that the Arab countries are not likely to mitigate this explosion of religious fanaticism, if only for economic reasons. Islamic governments have placed at the center of their action the spread of wealth and poverty alleviation, which were the key factors to trigger the riots. The rulers confessional, taken from the affirmation of religion in society, something that currently constitutes the core of their political programs, have dangerously neglected the economic and labor in companies that reach the poverty line, and for this reason are authentic powder magazines. In some cases these reasons are already riots erupted and were suppressed as did the arrangements, but just discontent, for now clouded by religion, it will surface in a massive developments going in another direction. Difficult to predict what.