For the U.S. Iran is more dangerous than North Korea

The U.S. also expressed their views on who officially considered the main threat atomic world. The declaration of Thomas Countryman, Assistant Secretary for international security and nuclear non-proliferation in the United States, Iran assigns, rather than to North Korea, the first place to danger in the context of nuclear weapons. The judgment, in truth, it seems more political than technical: the progress in the construction and be sure to Pyongyang, especially miniaturization of nuclear weapons, thanks to technological advances related to the study of military applications of plutonium, certainly puts in a more advanced knowledge and its consequent put into practice on the war by the North Korean town, the one that decrees the less dangerous relative, is made only from the state of isolation on the international scene in which Pyongyang has taken refuge. The absence of a network of contacts with other states or organizations potentially dangerous and uncontrollable decrees, so that North Korea, despite the higher technology developed has a less hazardous to Iran. The American reasoning is understandable and, to some extent, shared, although the degree of progress on the construction of the atomic Iran is definitely back again. Certainly an Iran in possession of the North Korean-scare a lot more, but this argument is precisely ascertained with American intentions not to allow Tehran to reach the level of Pyongyang. But this statement is also worrying, because it legitimizes the vision of Israel and openly endorses it. The consequences of this development suggest, even more, to a military approach to prevent the nuclearization of Iran's military. This in turn embraced by Obama so that it seemed sudden, after his election and culminated with the statements in his recent visit to Israel, authorize the United States to think that this idea has always been studied and considered in spite of tactics, based on 'diplomatic intervention and the action of the sanctions brought into the field, even so stubborn until the outcome of consultations prior to the election of the American President, after which the change in the attitude of Washington explicit that caution was linked more to the collection of votes that the solution to the desire to avoid war. Not that this is the preferred option, a conflict in the Middle East is an unknown so great due to the higher military world, however, the signals that go in that direction, you are, unfortunately intensifying at an alarming It is also true, that the world situation and, above all, that the Middle East has deteriorated significantly, but what worries the United States is the power of blackmail of a nuclear missile aimed at Israel by a state, which develops throughout his political strategy International, based on the assertion of radical Islamism, basically against the West, rather than a state practically devoid of a diplomatic policy, which seems to use threats with the sole purpose of blackmail.