Palestine: without political will are not enough U.S. investments

The American strategy on the infinite Israeli-Palestinian problem is more ambitious, thanks to 4,000 million dollars, the U.S. administration has decided to invest to boost the economy of Palestine. However, doubts about the success of the action of Kerry are all: the failures obtained from predecessors with more experience and prestige do not encourage hopes to see achieved the much desired peace. The current U.S. program from the base to bring down unemployment in the territories of the West Bank, which currently stands at around 21%, to arrive at the value of 8%, leading, in parallel, an increase in the average wage of about 40% . The areas the focus of investment will be those real estate and tourism, and the financial plan has certainly met the favor of Abu Mazen, who judged the action of Kerry as the most important by the Oslo Accords. It is an ambitious project, which could hide the intention of covering a political failure, which analyzes give almost for granted. The Palestinian position, despite the appreciation of the leader Mazen, in fact, do not seem to withdraw from the final formula of the two states and are strongly opposed to options that relate to the possibility of temporary arrangements or, worse, clearly defined boundaries, these possibilities, on the contrary, have always characterized the political tactics put forth by Netanyahu, both for the deep personal conviction to procrastinate as much as possible in the actual creation of a Palestinian state, both for internal structures emerged from the last elections, where the party of the settlers was essential for the life of the executive. Despite these premises Kerry insists that the political solution to the issue is a priority of the U.S. and that there is no alternative to the two-state solution, but the U.S. Secretary also said, almost putting his hands on, that the financial plan is definitely not an alternative to political definition, signal, showing that the fear of a possible misunderstanding Palestinian can do the complicated diplomatic maneuvers fail. Kerry's statements, they remain too vague, because there is a clear statement of position and contrast on the settlements issue, which, at the moment, are the major obstacle that blocks the negotiations, and without this step the Palestinian mistrust can not be bought even by a plan of massive investments such as those fielded by Kerry. Even the exhortations of Peres to Abbas to sit down at the negotiating table with Netanyahu, are too nebulous, because you call in too general a manner natural to a mutual partnership, which is based on the generic search for peace. What is lacking, both from the U.S., which Israel is a precise definition of the acceptance of nothing more than what has been achieved in Oslo, with a firm respect for the territorial division, repeatedly broken by the government led by Netanyahu. And that's the weak point identified by the Palestinian Authority in the attempts of the peace process: the strategic expansion of the settlements, the confiscation of land to the Arabs too frequent and research continues to alter the identity of Jerusalem, are too strong reasons to Palestinian hostility among the younger generations, who have ceased to believe in the possibility of a two state solution. This represents a huge danger in the international situation like the present one, because it exposes the enormous danger of Israel have in the house a mass of potential terrorists of great size, easy prey to the propaganda of the Islamic extremist organizations, able to reopen in a considerable way the front interior, thanks also to the lack of control, due to loss of influence, by PNA. In this context, the American tactic to provide greater economic prosperity for the Palestinians, it may be only a part of the means to solve the general problem, which remains essentially political: without a different arrangement Israeli, to find especially thanks to U.S. pressure on Tel Aviv, because it will be the solution of the two sovereign states.