Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates fund the new government of Egypt

The loans that Egypt will receive from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, respectively, of 5,000 million dollars and 3,000 million dollars, represent the approval of the policy change work with the deposition of Mursi and demonstrate the hostility of the two largest countries the Persian Gulf to the Muslim Brotherhood movement. Both Abu Dhabi to Riyadh were among the first to congratulate capital Cairo for the new political approach of the country as opposed to the common ally, Qatar, who had financially supported Egypt in the last two years. This difference in vision, now also Turkish diplomatic irritation, can score a dispute within the Sunni Arab world, where they are taking the field in two opposing vision of regional balance. The movements such as the Muslim Brotherhood, in truth were never thanked the governments of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, for their intransigence, both in the internal and international, it is remarkable that this distrust come from states where the observance of the precepts Muslims is one of the closest, but what disturbs Riyadh and Abu Dhabi is the international balance of power, that the inner slope. The two Gulf states fear a dangerous escalation of the fundamentalist movements in a particularly influential country in the Arab world, such as Egypt, which, after all, lies in the delicate geopolitical position date from the border with Israel. With the serious situation in Syria, the outcome more uncertain, an alteration of the stability between Cairo and Tel Aviv would have represented a real threat to the balance of the Middle East. It is possible that behind the move of the two countries there is also an agreement with the U.S., who prefer not to look directly into the internal affairs of the Arab world, according to the new political doctrine of Obama. Economic aid exacerbate the hassle turkish for the deposition of Mursi, because they represent a view diametrically opposed to what is hoped to Ankara, namely the development of moderately Islamic forms of government capable of governing the development of the Arab world. This assessment, however, does not seem even longer valid even for Turkey where the search for the imposition of rules too inspired by religious precepts has sparked protests in recent days. Perhaps the tactic of Erdogan was a gradual increase of weight in the religious laws of the country, also supported by a similar practice in a very important country in the Arab world such as Egypt. As you can see the two trends collide, presumably, with conflicting interests: on the one hand with the interests of international impose a greater appreciation of the intervention of the military in Egyptian political life of the country, across the grounds of internal justify the distortion of democratic rules. The game Egyptian, however, is far from over and is in constant evolution and its analysis are not to overlook these external forces, very close to Egypt, both for reasons of geography, and, above all, religious. As demonstrated by the financing of the Gulf countries and the activities of the Turkish diplomatic exogenous reasons, in the end, will have a weight almost equivalent to those of endogenous, but for the moment economic aid arrived in Egypt can afford to alleviate a crisis, which remains , along with matter of rights, one of the reasons constants of the demonstrations. Must be the work of the new Egyptian government to redirect aid, exogenous forces, into concrete measures internal, endogenous forces, able to lift the economy of the country and give them a greater confidence to the social system to get to the bottom of the political crisis .