Ukraine wants a diplomatic solution to the dispute with Russia

The purpose of the Ukrainian Prime Minister , you want to try at all costs to a peaceful solution for Russia, through diplomatic channels , it seems to be late , unless it does not mean , as assumed , the separation of the Crimea to Moscow , but also this might not be enough anymore. The evolution of the story, with the armed forces in the peninsula inhabited mostly by Russians and the serious economic situation in Kiev, on which rests the order for payment of Russian gas , requires a more pragmatic attitude to the Ukrainian government . Certainly the diplomatic solution is the best, but at the same time , this attitude with Russia, had to be adopted first . This applies both to the Ukrainians, who for Westerners , who are perched , with reason behind the practice of international law rather flexible and incomplete , especially for such cases. The correct action to be taken was a more conciliatory attitude on both sides , a solution was to Finnish , where he left Ukraine, due to its unique position , room for maneuver wider international political , which would avoid tying the country to one part completely excluding the other . In this way you would not exasperated Moscow and would not have caused his reaction , however, out of the norm of international law. While Europe has taken a fearful attitude , but all things considered prudent , the U.S. has forced his hand to push the country to the West Ukrainian exclusively for its own geopolitical purposes , without considering the possible negative solutions . Moscow's reaction is dealt with , just in this series , which was foreshadowed in the possible scenarios by strategists in Washington. If there were of a preliminary nature of the internal conduct of President Yanukovych, the author of a government action strongly influenced by the high level of corruption, it also remains true that what has caused the crisis permanently was the need to find financial aid for a country in crisis . In view of the billions of Euros provided by Russia , the EU has responded only with appropriations weak that they could not solve the structural crisis of Kiev. With a country in the throes of a strong polarization , divided into two on the accession to the EU or Russia , you had to , especially by diplomats from Brussels to opt for a transitional regime alliances , such as not to upset Russia, but that would allow also a long-term approach to Europe. With this series of errors, the credentials for a peaceful negotiation between Ukraine , with the support of the West and Russia , as proposed by the Prime Minister of Ukraine , does not appear to be very high . The Kremlin has already pretty much conquered the Crimea, see if deemed to be necessary to move forward, even in the most eastern areas of the country such as Ukraine and the recovery of the debt deemed exercise of Kiev. Furthermore the wish of the Prime Minister of Kiev also clashes with the reality currently present in relations between the U.S. and Russia. The dialogue between the two powers is at a standstill , especially after the Secretary of State Kerry has refused to make the visit to Moscow, where he had been invited by his Russian counterpart . On the military front , the continuous strengthening of the Russian military positions in the Crimea , NATO responded with surveys in Poland and Romania to prepare for every possible scenario , which may include the use of force actions . The whole evolution then involves the inconsistency of the proposal of the Prime Minister of Ukraine , which seems overtaken by events and submerged by the power of the actors involved, against whom Kiev, but also the EU , has now become a subject of second fiddle to the more broad international issue .