The European Union draws up the joint distribution of migrants arriving on European territory

The European Union Commission on immigration, because of the pressure of events, which resulted in mass migration to the old continent, as the Syrian War and famine in Africa, seeks to address the problem, after years of failed government the situation that has characterized the government of Barroso. In the Commission chaired by Juncker was a plan for the redistribution of migrants which covers about 40,000 people. Of these 24,000 were asylum seekers in Italy and 16,000 in Greece. It is Syrians and Eritreans who have requested political asylum and can not be absorbed only by the countries of arrival. The solution was greeted favorably by the Italian foreign minister, who, however, has also proved cautious on the results of the negotiations which will open in the coming weeks with other European states. For now it is important to note, beyond any numerical rating, which was judged by some undersized, while others evaluated in opposite ways, the introduction of a sort of principle that would introduce the principle of solidarity between the states of the union, about the problem of the division of migrants, preventing one or a few countries have charge of the entire issue. The solution was judged positively by the Secretary General of the United Nations, Ban Ki Moon, who sees a real possibility in the humanitarian sense for the future of the people forced to leave their country for reasons independent from them. Strong support of this authoritative, Juncker tries to make states more reluctant to accept this solution. In fact the only processing of the basic principle is not at all sufficient to ensure that the standard be, then followed by a genuine implementation. The first obstacle to overcome is for legislation: what we need is a qualified majority, but some countries have already rejected the proposal: Britain, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic; while France and Spain would put conditions to accept, therefore, part of the standard, due to concerns raised by a political situation anything but relaxed. The executive Juncker can rely on Italy, Greece, Malta (all three countries involved personally), Slovenia, Austria, that the important endorsement of Germany are in favor of the proposal drawn compactly, in addition to the substantial support of the majority of European parliament. According to the programs of the Brussels rules that you want to launch you should have a continuing nature, ie to be implemented in all the occasions when emergencies occur migration flows and, therefore, not only temporary and linked to the current situation. This intention of the executive of the European Union, will be the subject of further discussion between the member countries, to the resistance of some to make this stable mechanism of migration management. A stand out is the position of France, which locates in the proposed rules too rigid a system because it is based on quotas to be distributed among the member countries: the definition of share has declined from Paris, both for ethical reasons, and practical, because, of fact, could force states to accept a fixed percentage of arrivals of migrants; the measure could be perceived, at the moment where awareness of the problem is very high and is strongly conditioned by the right-wing parties, such as an obligation that comes from the European executive, a kind of tax difficult to administer for the government French. On the practical side, it is a growing need to monitor so some people coming through the fingerprinting, practice, which according to various states, it is not always followed in Italy and Greece; with this method you can determine whether migrants transferred will not leave the countries of destination. When both Rome, that Athens, are accused of allowing migrants to leave the country of arrival outside of a common European policy; While this may be true, it happens precisely because rules such as the one now thought the European Commission was not yet into this town. But beyond the controversy, the European Union is faced with a unique opportunity, born out of a situation of need, to recapture the spirit of European origins and abandon positions of privilege by some states, to promote the common dialogue, also in perspective decisions even more difficult, such as the one on the draft common defense, up to the conditions for political unity.