China, South Korea and Japan have met to promote stability in the region

The summit, which was held in Seoul, including the heads of state of South Korea, China and Japan, recorded the official resumption of the meeting that it was held for three years. The desire to establish a more consistent and prolific collaboration denotes what appears more an attempt to maintain the commitment of the guarantee of peace, regional stability and prosperity through free trade agreements between the three countries. It is of primary importance not only within the region but also worldwide, since the constant disagreements Trai three states, but especially between China and South Korea with Japan, governed by an executive marked by a nationalism increasingly pushed. The goal of the three countries to find a form of cooperation which meets standard criteria, which may be applicable to a wider audience in the future. For now, however, it must check the operation of these reports, on which weigh the issues of disputed islands, which Tokyo has underway with South Korea and China. It is emergencies of concern to the entire audience diplomatic, but that endanger first, the commercial relationships between the three states. The value of these trade arrive at the considerable figure of 17.5% of world GDP, while the production of Beijing, Seoul and Tokyo amounts to as much as 20% intra production on the planet. As we see, the numbers are very important, which could grow further if the three countries arrived to agree definitively a free trade area, which is in the project and subject to negotiation. The creation of a common market of this magnitude could have beneficial effects also on North Korea, which could show openings to its isolation, in exchange for involvement in the production of goods. However the attitude of the three nations to Pyongyang remains rather cautious. Seoul, Beijing and Tokyo have urged the North Korean regime not to continue on the path of nuclear proliferation, which remains the big question mark for the stability of the area. The three countries have prompted Pyongyang to respect the UN resolution against new nuclear tests, its just a short time after the announcement of the will of the new North Korean missile tests in the medium and short range. The problem of the existence of the North Korean dictatorship is felt, albeit in different ways, all three states, but especially from South Korea, which has undertaken a number of initiatives to get to detente with the North, after the recent clashes occurred at the border. Certainly a unity of purpose to mitigate the danger of North Korea shared with China, which remains the only ally of Pyongyang, is the signal that Beijing intends to solve the problem, that the Republic of China, is a threat to its maritime trade, the approach that the three states seem to want to use is soft, founded on international relations and the weapon of the economy, and with long-term effects, but that it should not provide for an involvement of the force. Of course, this summit could not have done with American blessing, great ally of South Korea and Japan, deeply interested in that does not open a new front of global instability in northeast Asia, considered a key region for economic development of the planet. The existence of good relations between the three major countries do not oblige Washington to invest more than you have in the region, both to protect the interests of the allies and to preserve its influence, despite the willingness of China to assert its power in the area. Despite military investments made, for Beijing, at this stage it is more important to the maintenance of economic growth, which in the region, can only be made in agreement with Japan and South Korea, finding an agreement that allows growth that can offset losses suffered in other markets.