The European Union wants to offer securities to African countries for the control of migration flows

The summit between the European countries which opens in Valletta, wants to find common responses by states joining the European Union, about the relationship with Africa and the problem of migration. The investment covers the 28 states in Brussels and 35 African countries; the meeting had been planned for some time, that is, since last spring, too long, to the relatively fast changes that the migration has registered, because of the explosion of the problem of the war in Syria and Iraq, with the entry in the problem of migration to new masses of desperate people fleeing conflicts Middle East and the opening of new routes to Europe. Once again, then, Europe shows a heavy organizational delay, which results from lack of unity among its members and the lack of an address common political, caused by the absence of the creation of political institutions due to common, with the necessary decision-making power and intervention, which requires increasingly rapid Rates of application to cope with emergencies increasingly serious. The Summit, therefore, was created to regularize the situation, still serious, but it has been overtaken by a disaster far greater, in fact, in front of 140,000 arrivals from the African continent and landed in Italy, there were more than 540,000 migrants They have traveled the route through Turkey and Greece. Despite this imbalance the reasons for the summit remain valid: relations with African states must be abandoned in favor of a regulation of the flow of migrants, going to affect the reasons that cause. Unlike migration from Syria and Iraq, caused by the war in progress, come from Africa migration caused by poverty, famine, weather conditions and even conflicts. The setting that Europe is trying to give itself about the reception is to try to give asylum to refugees and not primarily economic migrants, who are often caught up in the areas of origin of the African continent. One of the solutions thought is to try to reach agreement on a cooperative, with the states located a zone objectively difficult to manage or do not have adequate democratic standards. To reach a positive definition of these agreements is to provide the instrument thought were involved financial aid through a fund, which is expected to amount to approximately 1,800 million euro. The first problem, however, is to find the resources, governments at skeptics for this solution and often struggling with economic difficulties of the budget. The second problem, the first place that is at least partly passed, is how are you dealing with these funds. Given the high rate of corruption in some African countries, it is unthinkable to pay the fees in money meant for development projects and close the file, thinking to resolve the migration issue so simply; must control, but, above all, a coaching can bring to completion what was planned to promote employment and proper development of the countries involved, which does not concern only the purely productive, but also the health and formation . But still not enough, the governments of many countries, all of Nigeria, threatened continually see their sovereignty by armed groups, which often prevent international aid and appropriate it, making it impossible for aid. In these cases there are sufficient safeguards of civil, but also need to be coordinated with the military forces of the place. As we see the effort required is much more than just financial commitment, already not easy to secure. On the other hand at the present time it is difficult to conclude agreements with states who see remittances, overcoming the aid of the European Union. This figure has to reflect on the very real desire to reduce emigration, especially at a time where you want to re-establish the validity of Dublin and where some states intend to restore its internal borders. This means bringing the load pressure of migration mainly on coastal countries without effective assistance to these states and refusing the division of the problem. On this subject, the European Union plays its future, much more than on financial issues, which also constituted an element of debate.