Trump: The Republican Party is increasingly divided

The evolution of the Trump campaign, for some predictable ways, to a greater extent increases the fracture within the Republican Party. To the leaders of the party it is the confirmation of their inadequacy to direct one of the two US parties and, above all, they have been passive in the face ever-increasing importance in the American right, the Tea Party movement, hence the Trump phenomenon descends directly. For the Republican Party is the end of a conservative policy but firmly within predefined limits: Trump has dragged the name of the party towards a populist drift and the low political level, to restore the credibility of this political force it will be an enterprise, not impossible, but certainly very difficult. This is not good will for the United States, nor for the whole world; the possibility that one of the world's most important country's political parties take such an address, can only be a source of concern for the entire international audience: friends and enemies of the US. At the time the party is divided, with a good part of the leadership, which has already openly expressed against the billionaire candidate and the remainder that are determined not to rule, but is hoping for his defeat. One seems small are in favor of Trump, some believe because of the character, a bit not to disavow the response of Republican voters. On the basis of the division is less clear-cut party, but is specific to, a rift which stood almost on half of the voters, but where, consent Trump is set to fall as it had still a hard core prepared to accept any loss of style, but that seems largely insufficient to defeat Clinton. The feeling is that the thinking of the majority of the summit is to think of a sort of re-founding, stating the Republican Party within the furrow of its traditional values, which can not pass through the electoral failure of Trump. The game is still risky because if you verify this hypothesis will be easy for Trump lean specific blame for the defeat of the party organization, which is already doing little to support what is officially its candidate. What is at risk is a permanent struggle for the reason to hand over the country to democratic. Out of this situation it will not be easy and quick fix and short-term will only aggravate the state of things. One of possible scenarios, fact is that the party is finally conquered by the Tea Party, still influential, and become a clear populist training, that even if a minority of internal rules, Democrats can also drag of a dangerous drift policy. To avoid this the Republican Party should review its policy and bring thesis and new recipes that even in the wake of their own tradition, they can overcome the influence of the most backward parts of the country. It must, that is, to find a new mode of dialogue with potential voters, without going on populist grounds as was done in the primaries of the party, where it became clear that the classical writing of the Republican Party is not equipped to compete with those who It aims populist solutions to solve the problems of the country. This fact also is a symptom of the posting of the party leaders from the needs of the masses, who identify with the right, because it surpassed its own right by the ideals of the Tea Party. In part, the liability insurance to be reached this point is attributable to the party leaders, who initially believed, to be able to take advantage of the contribution that the Tea Party could convey the ranks of the party, believing that govern the phenomenon, which It got out of hand, even for the lack of alternative proposals that would give voters the confidence in the institutional part of the political movement. Basically what happened was a wrong political strategy: instead of focusing on the political content was believed to take advantage of the difficulties of the Democrats, by finding an easier consensus, but that was based on substantial differences ideals. From that moment on, the consequence has been to reach his Trump as a candidate of the Party, a candidate who represents the obvious symptom of the bad functioning of the party, unable to protect themselves from foreign interference. Certainly the radicalization of the conflict on the American political scene has been an element, in a sense, by surprise, which led to the expulsion of two political parties that did not express historically too distant political theories, however, if you want to make a comparison in the democratic camp, certainly compared ungenerous for Bernie Sanders, the party that expresses Clinton as presidential candidate, has been able to contain, even if not always orthodox means, a shift too far left, which could alter the appearance typical of the more moderate training democratic politics. It has gotten so on the eve of a presidential election, which presents a novelty: that of a candidate endorsed by the party that practically do not submit it. Looking beyond the specific case, which concerns the Republican Party, it must be emphasized that the flaw also affects the American electoral system, which, perhaps, has become outdated and needs an adjustment, not so much in the formal system, as in the real world, where bipartisanship does not seem to respond more to photography in the country.