The US Trump threatened by North Korea

The threats of North Korea, it would be closer to the construction of a ballistic missile capable of hitting with a nuclear device some US territories, they caused the reaction of the American elected president. Donald Trump has stated that this will not happen. However it is unclear how the new US administration intends to proceed to meet the threats of Kim Jong-Un: whether to continue on the path of sanctions, the preferred solution by Obama or to show signs of strength in the North Korean regime. It must, however, be noted, that the reason of the threats of Pyongyang depends in large part on exercises that the US Navy performs regularly with the same strength of South Korea; If, however, Trump deemed to decrease the US presence at the Asian allies, as repeatedly said during the election campaign, may, indeed, be the reasons of threats by the North Korean town. Certainly it would be a hypothesis widely able to subvert regional balance and would force the US allies to think of alternative ways outside of Washington protection. Moreover Trump has repeatedly stated during the campaign that you want to deal with a greater extent of the economic problems of the country, also shifting financial resources now used for the defense of considered strategic partners. For Obama, the Asia Pacific region was a priority and if it were not for the emergency Middle East resources that the outgoing administration of the White House, would dedicate to this area would have been even more substantial. Trump, beyond declarations, often disconnected from the international context, it has not yet made explicit his foreign policy agenda, and the only known element is just to make a drastic reduction in the budget that allows the US to play the role of power global, through its commitment abroad, he has held until now. That these intentions are, however, easy to implement will be anything but easy. The Pentagon's policy still provides an active management of certain parts of the world deem to be strategic for the US interest and that the military will be difficult to give up easily the financial resources to carry out their policy. These considerations can open up a contrast setting between the elected president and the armed forces and the same lobbies of armaments manufacturers: this misalignment of the respective positions expose the role of the US to a downsizing, the country could serve in the violation of his interests strategic and geopolitical. On the other hand the threat of Pyongyang do not come to the event and have the clear intention to test the new occupant of the White House reactions. The reaction of Trump, for now, seems interlocutory, while according to military analysts, the ability to build a ballistic missile that lives up to the threats of North Korea, appear to be almost safe. The US would then be exposed to a North Korean attack, but what will you do Trump has not yet been clarified. Of course the reduction of a commitment in the Pacific could also reduce the threat of Pyongyang, and it would be the year of an alternative measure to avoid the threats, but it could also be perceived as a sign of weakness on the part of Kim Jong-Un, always seeking counterparts for not putting into practice its threats. Trump has chosen to focus on China, identified as real enemy for the US economy and its continued devaluation policy that would put in trouble the United States. So these first forays into the international arena seem to highlight all the inexperience of the new American president and the lack of a comprehensive design in support of his action, especially in foreign policy.