Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
giovedì 9 marzo 2017
North Korea: the danger of war is ever increasing
Perhaps never so much as it is now a real risk of a conflict on the Korean peninsula. The
launch of four missiles, started from the North Korean bases, and
fallen in the waters belonging to the Japanese exclusive economic zone
and, moreover, less than 370 kilometers from its shores, constitute an
escalation of the tension, because of the technical procedures with
which it was executed. In
fact, the launch of the missile took place simultaneously, means,
according to military analysts, the desire to make more complex their
interception, thus trying to make, at least partially, the harmless
missile defenses in Tokyo. It
is clear that this show of force is directed against the United States
and bases where stationed its military, in Japan and South Korea. In the
intentions of Kim Jong-un, which seem almost pathological, there is the
desire to create a ballistic
missile, equipped with nuclear weapons, able to cover a distance
intercontinental capable of reaching the United States; on
the other hand the level of provocation is increasing with the progress
of the shows of force, so that in the latter the launch of the missiles
to Japan, the North Korean dictator has expressly stated that the
intention was to hit US bases on Japanese soil. Pyongyang
will certainly take advantage of weak measures taken against him,
which, until now, consisted in the application of sanctions, in
increasingly harsh theory, but that have been bypassed by the regime
even with international complicity. Another
factor underpinning the provocative action of Pyongyang is the
necessity of existence of the state of North Korea, functional for
Beijing to prevent the unification of the Koreas into one was an ally of
the Americans. In this way China would find his opponents, political, military and, above all, commercial, directly on its borders. The
existence of a kind of buffer zone between the Americans, present in
South Korea and the Chinese border, in Beijing ensures a safety zone
that does not give up easily: this, despite the problematic relations
with Pyongyang, which remains the ' only ally. China,
to keep alive the DPRK, in addition to bear the economic costs, also
suffers the political costs, which are represented by the continued
instability in the region and the continuing American presence and
attention that Beijing tolerates little willingly, in a region of world, which considers its right of influence. Yet
China, despite its great power available, in front of the intemperance
of Kim Jong-un seems to be stuck in an attitude of passivity. Some
analysts have credited Beijing attempts to overthrow the regime, all
promptly failed and the same sanctions adopted against Pyongyang, the
last of which was the interruption of the supply of coal, they do not
seem to affect the stability of the regime. But
it does not seem possible that in this case of China International
policy can be limited to the usual policy of non-interference in the
internal affairs of another state: the position of North Korea to
Beijing remains fundamental and too important not to deal with what
happens to Pyongyang,
rather the perception provided by the events seems to demonstrate to
the Chinese government a failure to solve the issue in their favor. On
the other front, the United States, the new president trump, after the
bombastic statements made during the election campaign and immediately
after being elected, does not seem able to fully understand for the
moment, and danger of the situation, you distinguishes more to an attitude that seems unusually cautious, probably it recommended directly by the Pentagon. If
the immediate danger is from Pyongyang, seems to be still, far more
dangerous a possible confrontation between Washington and Beijing, if
the Americans were to meet with the North Korean weapons, in defense of
Tokyo and Seoul: will China tolerate military action against not only an ally but, especially in what it considers its sphere of influence? Probably
these are the considerations that form the basis of North Korean
provocations aimed, once again, to get some economic benefit to a
country in complete collapse, the issue is how long it will go up to Kim
Jong-un.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento