Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
venerdì 6 ottobre 2017
European Union intervention is needed to stop secessionist instances
The European Union officially takes the position on the Catalan issue; through
the Commissioner to the Economy Pierre Moscovici, Brussels states that
the problem is of an internal order to the Spanish state and that,
however, the Union recognizes only Spain as its own Member State. The
reason for this position is certainly institutional, for Brussels to
say in favor of Barcelona, it would mean an intrusion into Madrid's
issues, but this caution proved by the Union seems to be also func-
tional to bring to light every other possible autonomy of other
territories , which would be a dangerous alteration of European balances. If
these reasons can be understood, one can not fail to notice how
Brussels's attitude towards Scotland was different, even if it was
caused by the unconvinced attitude towards the UK part of Europe and
concluded, when leaving the Union. But
the European Commissioner, in addition to condemning the violence of
the Spanish police and hoping for a solution to the issue-definition
dialogue, has identified a very important political reason, which is one
of the main causes of the request for autonomy by some regions . Certainly
for Catalonia there are reasons like central Madrid's aversion to
central power, coupled with the republican feelings prevailing in the
region, however, the European Commissioner identifies in the wealth of
the Catalan region the main reason for the request for autonomy; in
fact, part of this wealth is taken from the central state and this has
been experienced as an injustice, capable of altering the feeling of
unity. Basically, the existing problem is the unequal and homogeneous development of the different regions of a state. If,
for the central state, the logic, even shared, is to try to
redistribute resources from the richest regions to the poorest ones, one
can not understand how discomfort in areas with higher development
rates leads to shapes of will to leave the national state. The
Spanish case could be confined to greater autonomy in Catalonia, which
was rejected and left more resources in Barcelona but this would have
caused resentment in other parts of the country and would have caused
variations in the Spanish budget. This
is a common problem with other European states, where the discontent
for the lack of resource management produced in the region is the cause
of the emergence of autonomous movements, which reflect disapproval of
resource abatement (often masked with other motivations): a problem that is worsening in times of economic crisis. The possible solution put forward by the European Commissioner is a very smart insight, if implemented by Brussels. In
essence, where national governments can not intervene, a space for
maneuver for the European institution should be opened through
investments and projects in less developed areas capable of creating
economic growth that would enable the national economy to mitigate
withdrawals from regions richer. The
political value of this action appears to be very important: without
affecting the state budgets, European action would have the function of
normalizing relations between the regions and the state and between the
regions themselves, in addition to becoming a direct intervention of
Brussels in the territory, even if in agreement with the authority of the Member State. It would be, therefore, a tangible action of the Union and would help Brussels gain the trust of citizens; Indeed,
this could indirectly address the richer regions, which would see a
decline in tax revenue, and in a direct way the regions covered by
European projects. This
will be all the more true if the contributions of the Union will allow
stable and lasting growth in the poorest regions, in order to stop
unemployment and increase the incomes of their inhabitants. The
hope that Pierre Moscovici's intention is expressed in concrete acts,
even by surpassing the rigid budgetary logic that Europe has imposed on
member states and which have been the cause of greater distrust towards
Brussels.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento