Locked UN on new arms treaty

Action block for the approval of a new treaty on the arms trade, at the United Nations, by Iran and North Korea, there are elements that require careful evaluation of the evolution of global equilibrium. If the action of Tehran and Pyongyang, especially in this moment of history, can not fail regardless of functional assessments to their own interests, wanting to look with a wider view of the objections raised by the two states, it looks like the current situation is heavily skewed in favor of rules too abstract, requiring a more effective regulation. The problem of illicit trafficking of weapons remains an unsolved question, which if not addressed will continue to the contribution of massacres of civilians. The issue of the transfer of arms to those who commit aggression, when viewed from the side of the oppressed who rebel poses questions of no small importance. The Syrian example in this regard, illuminating: the representative of the government of Damascus, in fact, referred to the situation in his country, about the suffering caused to the people from trade and the supply of arms to the rebels, called terrorists. This lens is clearly the two visions and opposing needs and symmetrical, which can occur: on the one hand a regime already excellent customer supplier of arms, in this case the Russians, who complains of a similar market, perhaps American, but this is just a detail explanation, at which supply opponents of the regime itself, which had to take this away because they did not get results in a democratic manner. We understand how moral issues and opportunities of such an argument to be adjusted, hasten on a very thin ridge, where the two sides often have similar instances, divided only by different political views. The issues touched, however, an economically important, where companies are pushing for a treaty that would allow them much freedom as possible, also the implications that may develop on the political influence of the producing and exporting countries, who are holding the direction of the goods, is a powerful factor on the performance of wars, able to influence decisively the highly unstable equilibrium. However, the need to put the rules in the international arena is still very much felt in a uniform manner, regardless of the division of international politics. There remain, however, deep divisions about how precisely the method to follow the plant and general to give the treaty, which can not accept all instances, often contrary, from different parts. The suspension of negotiations aims to heal, at least in part, these contrasts with a new round of consultations between the countries, which promises to be fine now very complicated.