USA: what could be behind the attack in Boston

After the attacks in Boston, U.S. President Obama has made to wait for the nation, eager to hear his speech, to be reassured and have official news about the incident. The delay with which Obama has presented to the nation was dictated to speak to the country with some element of certainty, but it has not arrived. At the time, both the authors and the motivations of the attacks remain unknown. The American president has only been able to ensure that the authorities' response will be safe and, after what happened to Bin Laden, the promise is sure to be maintained. But now that the country is pressed not to slip back into insecurity followed after September 11. First impressions would reject the hypothesis of Islamic terrorism, both for the type of weapon used, which in the manner of the attack, investigators, those elements would provide the address of an inside track, which covers a wide range of possibilities: the flanges of the extreme racist movements, those who do not recognize the federal organization of the state and even the most intransigent associations in favor of arms. But regardless of who are the real culprits, the data shows that the American nation was again hit in a sensational and spectacular, to increase the resonance of the event. Moreover, there is an obvious problem of lowering the guard, matured, perhaps, in the belief that they have eradicated the external enemy, at least within their own borders, and have tapped the inner one. The case in Boston shows, however, as all the precautions current is not sufficient to protect the security and what does slip back into the U.S. in the most complete uncertainty. Could this be the first target of those who have committed the terrorist act in again in a circle, in a nation that is starting to recover from the severe economic crisis, fear and uncertainty, This could also serve to tighten policy strategy foreign, that the second term of the incumbent President, he embarked forms more likely to dialogue, even with the most recalcitrant enemies. But it could, on the contrary, open an internal front even harder to govern, as compared to all international processes that they see the U.S. as protagonists in the middle or at least important partners. If the inner race is confirmed it would reopen scenarios that seemed under control for some time and who might seek to undermine the very unity of the state. The re-election of Obama, particularly unpopular in some states, has maintained a level of deep dissatisfaction in a layer of the electorate escaped the control of the Republican Party, to which the Tea Party movement, represented a first signal, probably not fully grasped. The American Federation of the United States has always been traversed by deep feelings of rebellion against the government in Washington, confirmed that in several occasions in the course of time are produced in violent acts. The economic crisis and the attenuation of the perception of the external enemy, who had maintained within certain tracks these outbursts, may have favored the extreme act of Boston. This is only a reading as possbile, it can be disproved at any time, but that the United States should be carefully evaluated.