The Iranian foreign minister says that owning a nuclear device is a danger for your country

The Iranian Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, said to possess the atomic bomb would be a threat to the security of the country. The discovery borders on the obvious since Iran is already the subject of constant monitoring, which resulted in the harsh economic sanctions, which have caused a severe economic crisis, especially by the U.S. and Israel, with the latter more repeatedly threatened emptive military strikes. However, in addition to the sentence about the dangers of developing nuclear technology and detain war, the Iranian minister said that Iran has the right to develop a civilian technology is inalienable. Eventually the essential sense, although freed from anti-Western rhetoric, return to the previous government, which supported the same concepts. The rise to power by winning the election, the new President Hassan Rohani, had left to hope for a new evolution of the negotiations, but at the moment the position is always stall. But the new statement, coming directly from a member of the Government may give rise to two readings: first, that there is in the country a new Iranian willingness to resolve the nuclear issue, which is closely related to the solution of economic problems, which promise was one of the decisive elements that have guided the vote. This hypothesis is, for now, at hypothetical because the talks have not yet resumed and so it is impossible to make an assessment about the true intentions of the new government in Tehran. The second hypothesis is, conversely, if the most pessimistic attitude was only instrumental to gain further time to get to the final construction of the atomic bomb. Having this doubt is justified as the model of the relationship set by Iran on the nuclear issue: declarations of good intentions without any real result. It is the analysis of the current world situation: Iran is increasingly isolated and foreign policy of expansion growth of Islamism seems to suffer a setback, then logically the words of the Foreign Minister may be legitimate, especially if supported by the need to mitigate the sanctions to allow the revival of the economy, which is experiencing a phase of stagnation. If that were true would touch on Iran to allow adequate inspections to his suspicious sites in order to dispel any doubt, at which point the West could not deny the legitimacy of the Iranian choice to focus on atomic energy, developing and using technology already exists in many countries. The occasion, in fact if not to close, but at least to begin a journey that will lead to a satisfactory solution for all parties could be at hand, defining an issue that has caused and continues to cause a state of tension is not to be underestimated . You have to see if these conditions begin to occur to convince the most skeptical opponents of Iran: the U.S. and Israel, especially the latter must be convinced, will occur if the above conditions, a different attitude.