Putin accuses EU of meddling in Ukraine

The most important result , that Brussels has obtained, bilateral encounter between the EU and Russia was to become aware of the need for agreements that the EU wants to conclude with the eastern countries do not have negative consequences for Moscow. This assumption assumes a double meaning: to maintain good and stable relations with Russia, also with a view to the development of trade agreements and to not cause waves of violence , as happened in the Ukraine. While remaining firm condemnation of the violence practiced by the government of Kiev, in the crackdown on the demonstrations for the entrance in the EU , Brussels has basically accepted the criticism of Putin, who spoke of interference in the countries of the former Soviet Union. For example , restore the sense of the statement by the Russian President , who spoke of how the EU would react if Russia tried to take Greece , in the area of the Kremlin. This objection would be plausible if there was a wholehearted Ukrainian to Russian influence in the country , whereas the nation is split , however, the EU has not used any coercive means to try to enter the Ukraine in Europe. The statements of principle are so Putin appeared meaningless , in fact while claiming to respect the sovereign will of the countries of the former USSR , the actual conduct was of a different tenor . On the other hand, the insistence with which Putin speaks area of the former Soviet Union , presupposes a right to exercise influence , which is not enshrined in any international agreement , except in those subscribed to need, which can be economic (the most frequent) or of a military nature , intended for protection by the Russian army of states that can not properly be called democracies. Despite these statements of Putin have been criticized enough by the heads of the EU, who have tolerated in the name of affordability . However, do not be in competition with Moscow Open has its reasons , which must be understood . The need is to not make sense to Russia, that the agreements with the countries of Eastern Europe are not harmful to Moscow , the question is , however, not easy to implement , if not that Russia has a certain authority , that the Kremlin fears be injured by penetrating ever deeper ties and Europe. In that act is a subtle diplomatic war that you can not fight openly because we must , on the one hand and on the other hand , too much compromise relationships , which in economic terms, both parties agree . More than anything , Europe should expect greater institutional respect by the President of Russia, which has used and is using more and more frequently a language not too befitting of its diplomatic because too direct and not justified by the circumstances . What appears is that the EU uses a courtesy with no corresponding reciprocity from the Russian side and that brings up the attitude of Brussels too subordinate to Moscow.