The negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issue to the closure

The negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issue enters the final straight . The next meeting to be held in Vienna has the task of perfecting the arrangements have already been defined in order to respect the wishes of the parties. For the U.S. it is important to make sure that Iran does not actually have the intention and the means to build nuclear weapon , Tehran finally see each other is critical given the right to develop its nuclear technology for civilian purposes , factor important for the economy of the country and not to demean an issue that is also well become of national pride , felt a little in all sectors of Iranian society , according to the dictates of the leadership team . But for the final agreement , there are still six months time , as it should be achieved by July . In this period must be agreed that the highlights will be fixed these days. In front will be , once again , the foreign minister and head of the Iranian delegation , Mohammad Javad Zarif , and the European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton , flanked by representatives of the five permanent members of the Security Council of the United Nations (United States, China, Russia, UK and France) , supported by Germany ( together hence the name of the group 5 +1) . These are the diplomats, who last November have reached interim agreements pursuant to which Iran suspended uranium enrichment, which was followed by a first , but more symbolic lifting of sanctions . In front of the negotiations , in reality, there are more than six months expected , given that the negotiation period is extended for a further six months , it is, however, a sufficient time to close a troubled page of international relations , which lasts for at least one decade. The Iranian attitude is always positive Rohani established by the new president , who said he was just after his election available to accommodate inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency , but this is not sufficient for a more substantial withdrawal of sanctions, which is required for the closing of an enrichment plant and the stop to some centrifuges, as required by the USA. Implicitly, the Iranian counterpart has already accepted the enrichment of uranium up to 5% . So we are on track to reach an agreement that serves both parties . For Iran it is important to close the period of ostracism international sanctions lifted and re seeing in the international arena as the protagonist, for the U.S. to close a long-standing issue in the regional framework , more delicate in the Middle East , although the pressure exerted against Israeli will continue to be heavy. The release of the sanctions must also be seen as an economic opportunity at a general level : Tehran will recirculate in the world market its production of oil and gas , with a benefit from the safe side of the lowering of prices , while the exporting nations Iranian market consists of 80 million potential consumers , will become expanding market. But if from the front of the negotiators everything seems to lean towards the achievement of the major problems may come from domestic political opponents , the negotiation. On both fronts , in fact , there are rumors to the contrary to the agreement , which are based on a lack of mutual trust, these dissenting voices come from environments that have not yet resigned to sign a peace agreement between two nations which were once bitter enemies . In the U.S., the Republicans are the main enemies of the negotiations, traditionally wary of any opening in foreign policy and influenced by Jewish circles , close to the opinion of the Israeli government , could play a role dangerous trying to boycott parliamentary seats in the U.S. ratification of any Treaty. In Iran , however, are the environments religious hardliners not to trust the United States, which they see as handlers falsely interested in peace , but more likely weakening of the country of Iran.