Danger to world stability in the Israeli-Palestinian situation

The more complicated the situation between Israelis and Palestinians has the common fatherhood, to be found in the most extreme positions of the respective sides. Both are unfavorable agreements with the other party and work with methods similar to obstruct the peace process. It must be said that the increased rigidity of the government in Tel Aviv Abu Mazen does not help to counteract the action of the extremists of Hamas, who continue to see violated the territory of the West Bank with more and more settlements. Now we tend to identify the fact triggered the crisis in the killing of three young Israelis in the West Bank and the subsequent revenge, which led to the kidnapping and murder of Palestinian boy at the hands of ultra-nationalist settlers; in fact these tragic events are the culmination of a mistaken policy between representatives of the two sides, but especially in Israel, that did not stop the expansion of settlements and not included as a political union between Fatah and Hamas could be an opportunity for dialogue. The government of Tel Aviv has not been able to produce a policy of repression of fringe nationalist party hostage because of the colonies, which prevented a moratorium on the development of the settlements. This motivation continues for too long to be central and decisive role in the development of the situation: the failures of John Kerry, the U.S. Secretary of State, are to demonstrate the impotence of international politics in the matter. If, on the one hand, Israel continues to formally adhere to the principle of two states over a territory, actually does everything to go in the opposite direction, violating repeatedly and with impunity, international treaties and applying a disproportionate use of force, directed against the totality of the Palestinian people. This attitude is a source of exasperation, that is not even properly implemented by the international media. A few days before the murder of the three young Israelis, Israeli snipers shot and killed two young Palestinians, but no emphasis was given to the news. With this absolutely do not want to justify what happened, which is, in fact, a pretext for Israeli repression. Who, of the Palestinians, has made the infamous gesture could have calculated that Israel's response would affect the reaction of the Muslims, even those of the State of Syria and the Levant, to unleash a regional conflict from unexpected outcomes, including but could fall a drastic decrease in the freedom of action of Tel Aviv. This solution would still be a move of desperation, because it would force the U.S. to side with Israel on the military front, although it is known that for Obama such an involvement would be very unwelcome. Precisely in this perspective, however, one can not but notice the lack of an American diplomatic efforts to cool down the tense situation in a more comprehensive overview that includes the initiative to prevent a spillover of the conflict and the rising possibility that it could unite the various instability of the area, such as Syria and Iraq. As for Israel, it seems that his action is focused exclusively on the protection of their interests on their domestic front, without considering the effects that these actions may have on the international situation; Tel Aviv seems to be moving in a parallel world, confined to its borders or alleged to be, where it operates without any caution, characterizing its action with an institutionalized violence, that does not hesitate to squeeze the most basic civil rights of the Palestinian population on a continuous basis. The threat of a ground intervention, in retaliation to rocket fire from the Strip puts the world faced with the need to take sides and act in favor of peace in order to avoid more serious consequences that could endanger the balance of world power, as this by the UN, which, until now, remained silent spectator, confirming its uselessness as now happens too often in similar situations