The implications of the Israeli truce

Now that game is the truce in the Gaza Strip and Israeli troops are retreating, while maintaining a quota on the border ready to intervene, the priority is the reconstruction of houses destroyed by the bombing of Tel Aviv and the economic reconstruction of an area strongly affected by the restrictions of Israel. Do not forget, then the possibility that the Palestinian authorities have recourse to the International Court at the repeated violations against human rights, which could also lead to an indictment of the Israeli government for crimes against humanity; the hypothesis is not remote, and can not just be an obstacle to any peace talks, but would be an almost insurmountable obstacle to enable the country to emerge from Israel. However, these issues are now secondary to the emergency situation in which we find the population and must provide a fast program of reconstruction, both houses, that of infrastructure. The statements by the Israeli government, which put the security of the state ahead of everything, could result in significant impediments on the supply of material, partly because of the use made of cement sent by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, employee, according to Tel Aviv, to build the tunnel, instead of the houses. In order to achieve a lasting settlement, able to meet the basic needs that Hamas should assume a position of the second floor, so as not to affect too adversely the decisions of Tel Aviv. Hamas, however, despite the ostracism in the Arab world, caused by the proximity of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Gaza Strip still has a considerable following, which is based on a sense of rebellion of the people of Gaza, who are forced to live in an open prison and prestige enhanced by the conduct against the Israelis and the massacres committed by the armed forces of that country. To arrive at a constructive decision Hamas should have less importance to encourage the rise of more moderate leaders. This program was what I wanted to pursue and Abu Mazen who had successfully undertaken, raising serious concerns with the Israeli executive, which were definitely the basis for decisions to use force against the Gaza Strip. Tel Aviv is essential to have a party extremist, that could justify the use of strong-arm tactics. This also explains the lack of annihilation of Hamas and the same decision not to militarily occupy the strip to avoid removing defined terrorist organization, but elected by a majority in democratic consultations, political power. Hamas, under these conditions, is a prisoner of his role: the face of such violence can not come up with reasonable and cold political calculation, but this makes it functional in Tel Aviv for their own purposes. The one built by the head of the Israeli government is a scenario that should only stuck to the subject stronger. To break the hegemony of Hamas is, however, essential to grant more economic freedoms, such as that required for fishing, the people of Gaza, in order to promote the economic development and break the isolation. Greater well-being is the essential condition to truncate the extremism that collects many favors in Gaza. But now you must give hope to those who survived: restore infrastructure, roads, aqueducts and sewers, so as to prevent epidemics, this must be an absolute pre-eminence together with the reconstruction of schools and hospitals. Israel, in words said that will allow the reconstruction within a framework of demilitarization of Gaza, however, sources of Tel Aviv have already estimated at about 3,000 rockets arsenal still in the hands of Hamas. This estimate could be the obstacle to facilitate the reconstruction, but would also be a telltale sign of the real intentions of Israel, who have left so many weapons in the hands of the enemy. On the other hand this coincides with the worst fears of those who accused Israel of wanting to take infinite time to advance further with the construction of the colonies: the situation created has diverted any attention to that theme and allow Tel Aviv to continue its policy of removal of West Bank territory. The data provided by the Israeli army that about 900 terrorists killed, while international estimates there are about 1,850 total deaths; therefore, if the data Israelis were also true, we would have about 950 victims of too much to count among civilians. This tragic accounts can not be justified with the right to a defense, but must be seen in a broader political project also functional settlement expansion and to which the civilized nations and international organizations must ask for the bill to Israel. Sacrificing helpless victims in questionable political projects and who break international law should not be allowed to avoid jeopardizing peace in the world.