Iran could provide weapons to the Palestinians in retaliation for Israel

A reckless action of Israel could have very heavy repercussions on the stability of the Middle East region and during the troubled interstate powers involved in regional relations. The background concerns the killing took place in Iran of an Israeli drone, did not commented on the Tel Aviv by the flak Revolutionary Guard. The half plane equipped with two cameras lata resolution had long wings five and a half meters and was equipped with a flight range of about 800 kilometers. The drone would have been surprised in the airspace of the site for the enrichment of uranium at Natanz, in central Iran, and would have been shot down by a missile while on approach to what is believed to be the main site for the enrichment of Iranian 'uranium, with 16,000 centrifuges. The drone, although it is considered from Israel has no sign of recognition, however, the authorities in Tehran are virtually certain of its origin. This prompted the Iranians threatened to put in place concrete answers strongly if such actions are repeated. On the other hand the suspect Tehran appears justified by the position of the Israeli government, which has never changed, in stark contrast to the development of Iranian nuclear technology, both with threats of military action, that of condemnation to the negotiations, which should enshrine approval by the international community, the civilian use of atomic energy for the country of Iran. The crux of the matter, at least in terms of the short term, is the retaliation that Tehran intends to implement this act, considered espionage to its damage: the delivery of weapons to the Palestinians of the West Bank. With this act Iran could break in an official within the question between Palestine and Israel. The scope of this fact is enormous: Iran considers Israel a usurper of Arab territories and to the previous government did not grant statehood even in Tel Aviv, calling the Jewish state entities. For its part the Israeli state has always considered a threat to its existence to its geographical proximity to Tehran and have never accepted the alliance between the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Iranian state. Even so the factors of danger are very intense to bring further destabilization in a highly unstable and the border with the epicenter expansion of the caliphate. Tehran, providing weapons to the Palestinians, could seize an opportunity to increase its international significance in a question which, in words, it is important for the Arab world, but that, in fact, has been neglected by the Arab countries most important. In fact, for reasons of political expediency, the Gulf monarchies have more invested in the struggle for liberation of Palestine, preferring to accommodate what is nominally an enemy, but in fact is an ally: the nation of Israel. For Iran, the move back to arm the Palestinians could bring a gain of prestige in the Sunni world, which would credit the main country growth as the first ally of the Palestinians. The return of such action could allow even greater freedom of action of the Scythian militias against the troops of the caliphate, especially in key defense of Iraqi Shia, who were one of the populations most persecuted by the Islamic state. The decision to arm the West Bank must be seen as a liability action, as is the most moderate of the forces that are fighting for the construction of a Palestinian state, as opposed to Hamas, identified as a terrorist group and closer to the extreme positions of the state Islamic. Certainly the supply of arms is not an action of peace, as it could be a partnership in a diplomatic action and wants to be read just as the intention of wanting to force the military reports unbalanced in favor of Israel. It remains to be seen whether this action is in the interests of the West Bank itself, or could be a facilitation for the election victory of the current Israeli government. In any case, if this were to materialize could have serious repercussions on share also diplomats, concerning the difficult attempt to arrive at a definition of the Palestinian issue. Remains the clear violation of Iranian territory, carried out in a very sensitive period for the stalled nuclear talks in Tehran, perhaps identifiable as a misguided attempt by Israel to make them fail permanently, provoking a reaction from the Iranian definitely worsen reconciliation efforts.