The vote greek used by movements against Europe

One effect, certainly not secondary, the greek vote was to try to steal the referendum result by the anti-European and populist formations. Actually it is an event widely expected, but that should put some careful thought about the future of the European Union, which goes far beyond the fate of the single currency. The intention of Tsipras there was certainly to give voice to populist parties, because the greek prime minister has always been opposed to an output of Athens from the euro and Europe; However already in the election campaign, the right-wing parties, those populists and those anti Europeans have started a kind of support for the decision to carry out the referendum, with the assumption of a guarantee of democracy. Certainly this is true, but for many of these formations the greek government's decision was only a ploy to strengthen their positions. The fundamental error, again, was who led the negotiations and set on the basis of an economic austerity anachronistic, who have been sacrificed all possible tactics to not allow it to continue its populist propaganda: it was easy In fact, for as leader Marine Le Pen, talk about winning the European oligarchy. Unfortunately in this criticism it is more than a grain of truth, which does not mean that the solution proposed French far-right, populist parties like that of Italian, British, Dutch and other European countries is correct. To combat this Europe, it is proposed, in essence, to dissolve and go back in time to a sure loser against power structure larger and larger, they can put together the resources and means of production is not countered with the rigid division of the European nations, which was existing before the birth of the European Union. The most correct solution, on the contrary, would be to speed up political unity within an institutional framework capable of providing guarantees of democracy and equal treatment between member states, albeit in compliance with the discharge of their obligations. This setting, which should be natural, appears instead opposed by member strong Union, Germany, which has set, in this phase of history, its economic development by imposing a financial rigidity to other members, to allow you to develop favorable conditions only Berlin. What's most surprising is that the German action was not sufficiently opposed by other countries, such as France, where the government would have benefited in the perception of the electorate. Instead the vote greek is experienced with discomfort and as an insult to the fiscal policy of the Union and do not want to run for cover to avoid the spread of populism. The situation is freezing talks on principle and lack of flexibility and ability to adapt to the contingent reality, that is not only of reimbursement of debt, but it involves a much broader overview, spanning international relations, up to the very survival institution in Brussels. This myopia not only favors populism and from there, the step towards authoritarianism seems very short. Moreover within the European Union itself it is already very negative example of the Hungarian case, against which Brussels has not gone beyond generic warnings, confirming its inadequacy policy. In such a picture the hopes of the founding fathers of Europe have already been thoroughly betrayed, but continue in absolute rigidity could endanger financial and economic security of those who now is pursuing this pernicious policy, providing anti-European parties every day Moreover, arguments to declare the end of the European Union.