The European Union struggling with a minimum percentage of migrants

As the drama of immigrants continues with his victims, who do not seem to never end, and feeds the controversy between European states, which do not find solutions, although you draw the richest on the planet, we must take stock of the overall situation, comparing the data of acceptance in other countries, outside of the old continent, to examine with the proper criteria and benchmarks, one in Europe which is called emergency. Looking at the figures of acceptance of other countries will be obvious as the only emergency that should handle Europe is to save the desperate coming, that is to prevent shipwrecks and the poor condition of travel, not the moments that followed, for which an organization would suffice and a common coordination and not left, in the best case, the good will of some single nation. To fully understand the terms of the problem should be noted that the Syrian war began in early 2011 and, until now, has produced more than four million people have been forced to flee their country. The forecast for the end of this year is that the total value of this figure will be 4.27 million people; to complete the quantitative analysis of what caused the tragedy of Syria must be added that those displaced within the country amounts to 7.6 million people. Clearly, these numbers do not concern Europe, if not in small part. In Turkey the displaced Syrians are 1.9 million, 1.1 million are in Lebanon and even Jordan and Egypt welcomes more migrants than the whole of Europe. In Europe, in fact, this year 292,000 people came, which compared with the total population of 508 million inhabitants, represent a very low altitude, which could easily accommodate with effective programming, saving tragic deaths, suffering and opportunities easy for populist propaganda. Certainly the mutual distrust between the member countries, coupled with a very bad availability, due to racism, often opportunistic, large parts of the social fabric of Europe, did not facilitate things, but, for that very reason, a prediction of what would happen, would It favored a global solution, which was, perhaps, the game directly from Brussels. The lack of ability to predict the current scenarios, should make us reflect on the need for a reorganization of the structures of the European Union, which fell short and should certainly be appropriate. This was followed by the lack of unified organization, conditioned by the lack of political clout in Brussels and rivalry among states, that stronger treated anachronistic, such as Dublin, have embarked on a dangerous rebound of the problem from one latitude to another. In the middle of the ninth they lacked scenarios pure cynicism, as the Hungarian, who should be punished in an exemplary manner. One of the objections that may be made to this reasoning is that not all migrants are Syrian or otherwise, fleeing a war scenario. It is often said, on an opportunistic and hypocritical, that the welcome is just right for those fleeing from situations of war, but if this were true, Europe could accommodate more Syrians from long ago; in this sense, the only decision exemplary, although late was the German, who, bypassing the Treaty of Dublin, has promised to accommodating all Syrians on the soil of Germany. In relation to the reasons that force the other migrants to face endless journeys and often fatal, while failing severity of a war going on, appear just as serious: famine, religious discrimination, the presence of the Islamic state, the absence of guarantees and civil rights, seem reasons more than enough to accommodate people in clear difficulty, allocating resources, relatively limited if collected and rationalized in all the European members. Rather, Europe would do well to ask why the migration flows are increasing, albeit contained compared to the data previously reviewed. The answer, in its obviousness is disarming: the low value attached to the Union's political inaction, is a diplomatic, military, over an inability to be a promoter of the international action, has affected the territories closer together, as it was easy to predict . Without a leading role, that Brussels must be able to create alone, for Europe these scenarios will be repeated and will be suffered passively again.