Netanyahu and Obama meet for the first time after the signing of the treaty on the Iranian nuclear

The US visit of Netanyahu seems to have the sole purpose to make some positions in the administration in Washington, which sees the government in Tel Aviv and further away from the objective of the creation of two states and, thereby, to bring a significant contribution to peace in the region. The Israeli leader, rather than driven by real and convinced intentions to renew ties with Obama, seems to move to an international objective difficulty where you put by himself, with the policy of expansion of the territories. Israel is currently surrounded by the Western world from a coldness perhaps ever recorded against him. Tel Aviv elicits the perception of not wanting to engage in the peace process, avoiding any negotiations with gimmicks and increasingly recognizable only by pursuing the policy of territorial expansion in the Palestinian territories, practiced without regard to pre-existing international agreements and in contempt of the most obvious opportunities policy. It remains significant as the European Union intends to boycott Israeli products from the occupied territories, a clear signal thatthe Israeli government did not want to understand fully. Even against the current US administration mistakes were made, even more obvious, as part of the quality of the relationship which must exist between the people occupying government posts between nations deeply linked. Netanyahu, openly showing his liking towards the Republicans, has cracked even more relations with the Democratic administration, demonstrating political short-sightedness and, ultimately, of the absolute signal does not suit the role it plays. However, this trip that the head of the Israeli government should not make some willingly, seems a tangible sign of the obligation to which the Israeli government seems obliged to fulfill. The alliance between Washington and Tel Aviv, despite everything, has to remain very strong, to deep needs of both states, however, that, for Israel, even coincide with their own survival. It is significant that this is the first meeting subsequent to the signing dl treated for Iranian nuclear, long opposed by Israel, which in the past has repeatedly threatened to go it alone to the military solution against Tehran. While finding always in a negative way the solution found with the international negotiations, which avoids military nuclear proliferation in Iran, Israel has to accept the definition of the negotiation, which has become effective, despite the attempted obstruction from Tel Aviv alongside the Republicans in the maximum American parliamentary seat and operating an interference in US domestic politics. The meeting between the two leaders should be used to fix at least some of this episode, which is still considered by the White House a snub. A kind of reconciliation is necessary because the cooperation between the two states within a scenario of a middle east particularly prone to severe turbulence, remains essential, even if flawed by bad relations between the two governments. Furthermore, the agreement on the defense established between the two countries is due to expire and be replaced will be the one that will enter into force in 2017, within which have not yet been defined supplies of the quantities of combat aircraft and helicopters the Israeli state. Precisely on this point it appeared instrumental statement Netanyahu to revive the peace process with the Palestinians; the real intention of this connection have expressed many doubts, as outlined by Obama himself, it seems, in fact, be, on the experience of the past, the repetition of the empty promises made by the Israeli leader to gain time to his cause: that is to increase the settlements or try to give a veneer of credibility to the desire to restore relations with the American president.