Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
venerdì 8 gennaio 2016
The Earth comes from the Holocene geological epoch
The
news that would end the current geological period, the Holocene, began
11,700 years ago, it comes from British scholars and is designed to make
obsolete any climate agreement and, if included in the right measure,
to cause a major overhaul in the social of the world. The
reasons for the end of the geological era are present to detect all in
human behavior and in the excessive human presence on the planet,
subjected to a great stress because of excessive spread of pollution. The
new geological era in which we would have entered has not yet been
given a name, but the environmental characteristics are the same as when
the land passage to the Pleistocene, in fact, the Holocene, a situation
characterized by glaciations, but also by deep differences in
temperature capable of generating a global warming more important, as is happening today. The
fact that all of humanity has developed within Holocene, making it even
more relevant to its end, opening great unknowns about its future. What
appears is a need for a profound transformation of relations of
production and in the procedures, which in numbers and that the
measurement of gross domestic product to quantify the success of a
nation takes on a dangerous, if connected to the environmental
destruction due to ' increase industrialization, which took place without the necessary limits, able to prevent the profound climatic deterioration. This
news crosses the immediate emergencies, made of natural disasters and
the increase in dangerous diseases, which must be placed only as
contingent causes and forerunners of a future far worse. The
current situation is deeply conditioned by the rise in temperature that
remains the central point on which to act, but the time limit within
which to intervene, they have set themselves the representatives of the
nations, they appear too late and still seem a partial solution to a
problem which invests the social sphere and the organization of production and finance globally. We
must review the projects in the short and medium term to embrace a
philosophy of programming able to plan on time spans also based on
centuries, to start a phase can reverse the transformation of the
planet. Of
course for this we need a unity of purpose that goes beyond borders and
national interests and not be seen as a mere will environmentalist, but
as a will to survive, before and after conservation. In this framework a social structures put forward are inadequate to manage a process of this news; the
goal should be to not be invested, in a few generations, from a
situation of extreme emergency able to endanger the survival of the
human race. At
the basis of this review should be a social redistribution of total
income based on a division can deal first natural emergencies such as
weather disasters and famine, so that oversight of all areas of the
planet in a functional the
preservation of the natural environment and then so as to allow the
maintenance of conditions designed to stem the deterioration of the
planet, from which to launch a virtuous cycle of regeneration. It
is clear that much of the industrial structure should be destroyed,
except to be converted in the protection of the planet, it does not mean
inaugurate an era of poverty, but only consumption implemented through
different productions based on criteria totally opposed to the current. A
recovery in agriculture carried out in a cyclic and non-intensive, as
well as livestock and use a different, more intelligent, of future
technology, not based on the criteria of maximum productivity, could
form the bases for a different economy able to ensure the preservation of the environment. Of
course without a supranational authority with adequate powers of
sovereignty it is impossible to break the ostracism that big business
and industry dictate through conflict state, departing from and arriving
diplomatic disputes, including through religious wars, the
confrontations. At
this stage the world is busy in issues, which although very important,
are divisive and the special interests of nations not allow a visual
list of impending danger even greater than at present, or, perhaps, the
current ones are only the actual measurement and Actual short-sightedness of those in power. At all levels.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento