Blog di discussione su problemi di relazioni e politica internazionale; un osservatorio per capire la direzione del mondo. Blog for discussion on problems of relations and international politics; an observatory to understand the direction of the world.
Politica Internazionale
Cerca nel blog
giovedì 11 maggio 2017
The US will provide heavy weapons to Syrian Kurds
On
the eve of Erdogan's visit to the United States, when he meets with new
President Trump, the White House has authorized a supply of heavy
weapons for Syrian Kurds. The
aim is to conquer and subdue the city of Raqqa, an objective considered
essential by the Pentagon to defeat the forces of the caliphate. So
the US military strategy, despite the change at the top of the state,
does not change: what is happening with Obama, continues with Trump, the
Kurds are still identified as a key element for fighting on the ground
to counter the Islamic state ; On the other hand, the only alternative was to deploy American troops directly into the combat theater. As
far as relations with Turkey are concerned, this decision is likely to
undermine relations between the two states, as the supply of heavy
weapons is targeted at Kurdish-Syrian militias, which Ankara considers
to be terrorists, like the Islamic State itself. The
issue is well known, Turkey fears the birth of a Kurdish state on its
borders and has not hesitated to use arms, often in agreement with Assad
and the Russians, just against the fighters that the White House has
decided to supply and which are Have always been tied to a close relationship with the United States. In
the passage of power between Obama and Trump, there has been some kind
of loosening of American interest in the Syrian question, which also
involved support for the Kurds; This
has led to greater freedom of action by Syria, Russia and Turkey,
against Kurdish fighters with anti-Syrian Kurdish militant initiatives,
which have intensified and seemed favored by the declarations that the
new American president had made in the electoral campaign And which led to a gradual detachment of the US from international politics; So
it was not: Trump's intentions collided with national interests and the
necessary grip on the United States of the most delicate diplomatic
scenarios. That with the Kurds is an alliance that goes to Bush, when Iraqi Kurds were decisive for Saddam Hussein's defeat. The
impression is that American trust continues, also thanks to the
military results obtained by the Kurdish militia, who have proven
themselves to be trustworthy and confident in military affiliation. Trump's
choice expresses the need to create a precedent for Turkey, which is
also the continuation of his predecessor's policy, and which removes
Erdogan's hopes of bringing the United States back to the Kurdish
question, which the Turkish President Believes the most important for his country and his government. The
US official statements about the matter have become descriptive and
circumstantial and do not even seem sufficient to justify the fact that
the White House had made no official statement to Ankara of the
willingness to supply the Kurds who could probably use These armaments, as well as against the caliphate, also to defend themselves against the attacks of the Turkish army. With
this decision Trump conquers Raqqa, the stronghold of the Islamic
State, in the face of relations with Turkey, both to defeat the
caliphate in places where it still exercises its sovereignty, and to
abide by this merit, both to offset Russian politics, much Active in Syria. With
actions in the Syrian conflict, Moscow has once again become a major
player, coming from international isolation to become a protagonist and
has progressively gained the scene of the Syrian war with a commitment
to justify the much-respected international significance. Though
Trump's direction seems to give rise to these Russian aspirations, the
organization of the American government is structured so as not to be
univocal and aligned with its most important institutional figure but is
capable of pervasing a wide range of interests capable of Represent and put into practice their points of view. Thus,
it is a substantial part of diplomacy in agreement with the military,
they preferred to sacrifice, at least for the moment, US relations with
Turkey, for the defeat of the Islamic state, through the support of
Kurdish fighters. This
is a precedent that can not easily be defeated in the case of the
Syrian Kurds requesting the White House and the Pentagon to support the
aspirations of the Kurdish people. Just what Turkey is fighting to do.
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento