Politica Internazionale

Politica Internazionale

Cerca nel blog

martedì 11 febbraio 2014

The prosecution of terrorism in India to the Italian military is dangerous for international relations

The story of the Italian marines , held captive in India for a controversial murder case of Indian sailors , mistaken for pirates , took an unexpected development . The Indian authorities have decided that the two soldiers will be judged according to the law in force in that country, terrorist activity , a willing lawyer called , precisely , anti terrorism. The first apparent anomaly is to judge a tragic incident as a terrorist act , but the second , much more serious in terms of law and international relations , is to put in the dock , not too indirectly , to another country, the ' Italy , as the instigator of the terrorist act itself. We start from the description of a terrorist act , which is the act or violent action time to propagate a political message against the institutions of a country and is characterized by a very specific ideological aspect . It is not clear , therefore, that the ideological intention may have moved to Italy to perform any act tending to affect the Indian state . The prosecution Indian , obviously, is a mere pretext to cover domestic politics , which have assumed the character of feuds and that have nothing to do , nor with international law and , at this point, even with the Indian law , which, after all , was not equipped to handle the affair, having set up a special court of settlement , absent in the laws of the country up to this time. On the other hand its handling of the affair by India , which is not assured , it currently seems to ensure legal certainty , raising exceptions and continuously using continuous delays , puts the country of India as reliable even in a perspective of future agreements of any type, including commercial ones. In a future vision appears to be essential for the entire international community , that the story falls in the channel of international law and that India will be forced by any means , peaceful means , to bring the issues to the relevant sites , which are not his precarious special court , not to create a dangerous precedent , which could be exploited in several future occasions individual and unique and could become the cause of degeneration of international relations with serious consequences . It should be recognized that in all this time Italy had a little more than amateurish behavior , characterized by a wait-and probably justified only by the fear of interrupting trade agreements at a time of severe crisis. However, even supranational institutions , for the first United Nations, have underestimated the story hesitating to direct intervention that could make you feel all the weight of the influence of the UN. For this attitude you can think of Indian Country as one of the main calling for reform of the Security Council , in which India aspires to a permanent place , in the light of the facts seems anything but deserved. It seems likely that the head of the UN did not want to interfere to have no possible subsequent retaliation in case of success of initiatives in India. Another subject that has been too silent is the European Union , too concerned to impose budget constraints with tremendous deleterious effects on its citizens , rather than to enforce its rights , which are also those of Italy , in the international field . It took the Indian arrogance passed a landmark place well beyond the reasonableness because finally the wrath of Rome and Brussels took shape : at this time what India is in danger is to remain penalized in its many international initiatives that are needed to increase its gross domestic product , but morally this is not enough, unless you add the condemnation of the attack were other common rules of coexistence of international relations that New Delhi is pursuing . The one in the game goes far beyond the ascertainment of the truth of a dramatic episode , however, marked by ambiguity investigation and management of the Indian police , who will still be there, but with all the specificity and particularity that the case imposes the same for the actors involved .

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento